6 |
Scientific knowledge: Pharmacology (Topic related)
(Linked to learning outcome 1)
|
Impressive (6 pts)
The topic has been accurately and professionally described. Correctly applied the pharmacology key knowledge relating to the topic.
|
Proficient (5 pts)
The topic has been described. Developed the pharmacology knowledge relating to the topic.
|
Progressing (4-2.1 pts)
The topic has been fairly addressed. Demonstrated the basic knowledge requiring to this topic.
|
Basic (2 pts) The topic has not been addressed well. Not clearly applied the pharmacology knowledge to solve the issue.
|
Weak (1 pts)
The topic has not been addressed. Confused message.
|
|
6 |
Scientific accuracy and critical thinking
(Linked to learning outcome 2)
|
Impressive (6 pts)
Very clear, comprehensive and excellent discussion of the drug, mechanism and its target(s).
Excellent solid research has been identified to discuss the mechanism of action.
|
Proficient (5 pts)
Clear, comprehensive and very good discussion of the drug, mechanism and its target(s).
Some solid research has been identified to discuss the mechanism of action.
|
Progression (4-2.1 pts)
Limited discussion of the drug, mechanism and its target(s).
The view of previous studies is presented, but a little critical analysis of the outcome.
|
Basic (2 pts)Very limited discussion of the drug, mechanism and its target(s).
Not enough information or some information is inaccurate.
The view of previous studies is presented with only a vague original thought.
|
Weak (1 pts)
The drug's mechanism and its target(s) have not been discussed clearly. Information is often inaccurate.
Scantly researched with no real outcome of solving the issue.
|
|
3 |
Application: Communicate this knowledge
(Linked to learning outcome 3)
|
Impressive (3pts)
a) The document demonstrated clear written communication skills with appropriate research. Well constructed.
And/Or
b) References effectively integrated into the text to support the point being made. Accurately referenced.
|
Proficient (2.5 pts)
a) The document demonstrated clear communication skills and appropriate research.
And/Or
b) References appropriately integrated in a satisfactory manner. Appropriate style of referencing with minimal errors.
|
Progressing (2 pts)
a) The document demonstrated mostly a range of suitable written communication skills.
And/Or
b) References integrated into the text but not accurately cited. A number of errors.
|
Basic (1.5 pts)
a) The document demonstrated ineffective manner with some errors.
And/Or
b) References poorly integrated into the text. Multiple errors throughout referencing style.
|
Weak (1 pts)
a) Communication in the entire document did not meet the standard level. Careless language choice plus poor spelling/grammar errors.
And/Or
b) A few or no references. Careless use of referencing style.
|
|