You will need to choose a specific health issue and ensure that it is not too large. For example...

Question

You will need to choose a specific health issue and ensure that it is not too large. For example obesity is a very complex problem and it would be better to focus one aspect of obesity and not everything related to obesity. You need to ensure your issue is manageable for the assignment.

Health Systems, Systems Thinking and Advocacy for Change Systems Thinking Assessment 3: Using Systems Thinking to address a public health issue Due Date: 11.59pm Sunday February 28th Submission: via MyUni (Turnitin) Assessment Length: 2000 words Assessment Value: 30% Learning outcomes assessed by this assessment task: 1. Demonstrate an understanding of the building blocks of health systems and describe how these are translated into the health systems of different countries. 2. Demonstrate an understanding of how the principles of systems thinking and complexity science can be adapted to inform system functioning, facilitate multi-sectoral collaboration, drive change and successfully implement public health programs. 3. Demonstrate an understanding of the core principles of advocacy and demonstrate how they can be applied at various levels, including in government, in different organisations and at a community level 4. Effectively present accurate demographic, statistical, programmatic, and scientific information for policy makers, lay audiences and the media 5. Identify how advocacy principles can be used to identify policy options that should be targets for advocacy 6. Demonstrate an ability to apply effective leadership, communication, political science and negotiation strategies in an advocacy context Assessment Outline In this assignment, you are asked to identify a complex public health issue (either in Australia or in another country to be agreed with the Course Co-ordinator), and examine how systems thinking can help public health practitioners to:  identify the broader systems issues associated with this problem  why it is considered complex  how systems thinking could be used to address the problem. You should:  outline the background of the issue you have chosen  describe how the issue has been addressed in the past – was it mainly a reactive approach?  explain why the issue suitable for Systems Thinking approach  describe the mental models and assumptions that underlie that approach - how you might recognise those assumptions and how you might change these mental models In order to take a systems approach you will need to use some of the Systems Thinking Tools we discussed in class. You may use tables and diagrams – these are not included in the word count Don’t forget your references

health-system-assignment-3-udbktptj.docx assessment-3systems-thinking2021-mpyswnmf.pdf scoring-criteria-2-2n4pfbjf.png scoring-criteria1-qnuvfr23.png

Mehzabin · Accepted Answer

OBESITY IN AUSTRALIA
Table of Contents
Introduction	3
Background of Obesity in Australia	3
Obesity among Australian Adults	3
Obesity among Australian Children	4
Obesity among Indigenous Australians	5
Obesity in Australia Addressed in the Past	5
System Thinking Approach	6
System Thinking Approach Suitable for Obesity	7
Conclusion	8
Reference	9
Introduction 
Since 1980, obesity has amplified rapidly in Australian adults and described as a body form index of 30 kg/m2 or more than that during the time when nationally demonstrative statistics first became accessible. Since the year 2000, there has been world-wide conversation of a probable raised ground in trends in the commonness of obesity, especially in children. Nevertheless, to settle on the trends in the commonness of obesity in Australia, an absence of comparability surrounded by survey approach and inhabitants has made it complex. This paper aims to discuss further about the obesity in Australia as a very complex health issue.
Background of Obesity in Australia
The absence of consistent, systematic and efficient inhabitants’ health observing in Australia which includes all ages and zones had obstructed the understanding of people relating to the progress of this most important health trial, further than the aforesaid basic comprehension of complete shifts in commonness. There is a resilient consensus that consistent, widespread, equivalent and precise observing is serious in order to highlight and allot obesity inhibition and management approaches and to detect alterations over time with confidence. Between 1995 to 2004-05, the commonness of obesity had amplified significantly according to past data displayed in the National Health Survey 2004-05. It was reported that heights of obesity augmented from 29.5 per cent in the National Health Survey 1995 to 32.6 per cent in 2004-05. The commonness of obesity amongst adults in Australia at the more crucial end of the scale was 11.1 per cent in 1995 and rose to 16.4 per cent in 2004-05 (Huse et al., 2018).
Obesity among Australian Adults 
The National Health Survey measured the most current data on the prevalence of obesity amongst the adults in Australia from 2014-15. The adults in Australia were living with obesity or overweight were about 63.4 per cent in 2015 and nearly almost half of these people were living with obesity. It was reported that obesity in men was more common than obesity in women. Therefore, men had larger prevalence of obesity. Reporting of the Australian Health Survey of 2014-15 data by territory and state pointed out small deceptive changes in the commonness of obesity all over the territories and states. Tasmania being the highest while observing commonness of obesity and the lowest that had commonness of obesity was the Australian Capital Territory (Mannan, 2018).
In between 1995 and 2014-15, there was a significant increase in commonness of obesity by 5.6 per cent among the adults in Australia. Out of which the observed commonness of obesity amongst men changed by 9.5 per cent and in women 8.1 per cent. The commonness of obesity in between 2011/12 and 2014/15, whether combined with overweight or separate, did not change considerably in the totality of the inhabitants or for either sex. Some distinction amongst states in the amount of alteration in the commonness of age-uniform obesity between 2007/08, 2011/12 and 2014/15 has been suggested by study of the tendencies by territory and state (Mannan, H., 2018). However, the implication of these differences has not been tried by any Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) reports. The alteration in obesity commonness between 2007/08 and 2014/15 extended from -2.0 per cent in Western Australia to 8.3 per cent in Tasmania. 
Obesity among Australian Children
Approximately, 27.6 per cent of Australian children ageing from 5 to 17 years were detected to be living with obesity or overweight in 2014/15. Out of this percentage, the exact 7.4 per cent of children were living with obesity. Obesity combined with overweight was increasing with age amongst Australian children in 2014/15. In the commonness of obesity alone, no changes were detected amongst the children between the ages of 2 and 17, yet with detected differences in the commonness of obesity and overweight combined being drawn by differences in the commonness of overweight amongst children in Australia (Huse et al., 2018).
Among the children in the National Health Survey of 2014/15, the commonness of obesity gave an impression of varying all over the territories and states. The highest detected commonness of obesity was found in the Northern Territory with 12.

Health Systems, Systems Thinking and Advocacy for Change Systems Thinking Assessment 3: Using Systems Thinking to address a public health issue Due Date: 11.59pm Sunday February 28th Submission: via...

Answer To: Health Systems, Systems Thinking and Advocacy for Change Systems Thinking Assessment 3: Using...

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

Submit New Assignment