1.) What were the facts about the two paralegals in this case? What degree of access did they have to confidential information in this matter? What was the extent of their work on this matter? Did it...

1.)


What were the facts about the two paralegals in
this case? What degree of access did they have to confidential information in
this matter? What was the extent of their work on this matter? Did it make a
difference?

2.)




The court’s decision has a clarification of part
of the Ciaffone case and overrules part of the Ciaffone case. What are these two
holdings?

3.)


What should a firm do when it discovers a
conflict carried by a new paralegal?

4.)


What factors will a court look at in deciding
whether to disqualify a firm based on a paralegal conflict?

5.)


Did the court indicate why it had so
misinterpreted the state of the law when it issued the Ciaffone opinion?

6.)


What do you think of the points raised by the
dissent?

Ajarey Pagala October 12, 2022 (Week 7) LAW 263-1001 Professor Anderson Leibowitz v. District Court (Page 249-253) 1.) What were the facts about the two paralegals in this case? What degree of access did they have to confidential information in this matter? What was the extent of their work on this matter? Did it make a difference? 2.) The court’s decision has a clarification of part of the Ciaffone case and overrules part of the Ciaffone case. What are these two holdings? 3.) What should a firm do when it discovers a conflict carried by a new paralegal? 4.) What factors will a court look at in deciding whether to disqualify a firm based on a paralegal conflict? 5.) Did the court indicate why it had so misinterpreted the state of the law when it issued the Ciaffone opinion? 6.) What do you think of the points raised by the dissent?