Assessment 3Start AssignmentDueFridayby10:00Points45Submittinga file uploadAvailable2 Feb at 0: XXXXXXXXXXMay at...

1 answer below »












Assessment 3

























  • Due








    Fridayby10:00














  • Points


    45








  • Submitting


    a file upload








  • Available


    2 Feb at 0:00 - 10 May at 23:59


























Assignment3:Reflective Essay














2000 words (+ / - 10%)














45% weighting














Due before Week 13 Friday 3rd May 2024 by 1000am























Topic:











Aboriginal health is defined as "not just the physical well-being of an individual but…the social, emotional and cultural well-being of the whole Community in which each individual is able to achieve their full potential as a human being, thereby bringing about the total well-being of theirCommunity. It is a whole-of-life view and includes the cyclical concept of life-death-life."(National Aboriginal Health Strategy,1989).












In relation to the above definition of health, articulate how cultural identity influences the health equity of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. Within your discussion, reflect on your learning in 7434 this semester sharing insights into how your understanding of the experiences of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples has evolved.








Presentation Guidelines:





























Document formatting requirements include:














  • a cover page stating thecourse enrolled in,unit number, unit title, assignment title, student number, actual word count of the paper submitted (not the assigned word count)and thereferencing style utilised.








  • text should be 12 point and double spaced with 2.5 cm margins








  • each page is to be numbered








  • reference list should commence on a new pagewithallresource materials appropriately attributed























Rubric













7434 Assignment 3 Rubric



































































































































7434 Assignment 3 Rubric





CriteriaRatingsPts












This criterion is linked to a learning outcome





Depth of analysis and reflection.


Students are required to reflect on their learning and
discuss a new idea they have learnt this semester that has changed the way they understand the experiences of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.




























































10Pts



Excellent



Excellent exploration of the implications of arguments or evidence in new contexts or in particularly thoughtful, insightful, and/or original ways. Paper shows a nuanced grasp of theoretical perspectives and demonstrates the ability to apply these principles with facility to reflect and reveal a personal narrative that integrates an understanding of the experiences of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.
























8.4Pts



Very Good



Very good exploration of theoretical perspectives and principles to reflect and reveal a personal narrative that integrates an understanding of the experiences of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.
























7.4Pts



Good



Good exploration of theoretical perspectives and principles to reflect and reveal a personal narrative that integrates an understanding of the experiences of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.
























6.4Pts



Adequate



Adequate exploration of theoretical perspectives and principles to reflect and reveal a personal narrative that integrates an understanding of the experiences of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.
























4.9Pts



Unsatisfactory



Unsatisfactory exploration of theoretical perspectives and principles and / or inadequate personal narrative and / or inadequate understanding of the experiences of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples articulated.


















10pts


















This criterion is linked to a learning outcome





Argument


Students are required to link this
reflection to discuss their
understanding of how cultural
identity and
understanding influence health
equity

























































10


to >8.5


Pts



Sophisticated:



Clearly and eloquently identifies a demonstrable and nuanced central argument Provides the reader with a clear sense of the nature of evidence that will follow. Reveals the organizational structure of the paper. Guides the reader smoothly and logically into the body of the paper.
























8.5


to >6.5


Pts



Highly Competent



A demonstrable central argument. Gives the reader a reasonably good sense of the nature of evidence that will follow.
























6.5


to >5.0


Pts



Fairly Competent:



Although demonstrable, the argument is not stated sufficiently clearly. (and/or…) Does not guide the reader throughout the paper.
























5


to >0


Pts



Not Yet Competent



There is no discernable argument and /or the argument does not provide evidence of an understanding of how cultural identity and understanding influence health equity


















10pts


















This criterion is linked to a learning outcome





Evidence


Students are required to support
their argument by referencing using APA 7 style, including hanging indent reference list,
and acknowledging the material
/ lectures/
reading/ tutorials or other
experiences that framed this
new learning.

























































10


to >8.5


Pts



Sophisticated:



Evidence used to support the central point is rich, detailed and well chosen. Evidence sections employ appropriate illustrations and/or quotations. The connection between argument and evidence is clearly and compellingly articulated in all cases. (Where applicable) Important opposing evidence (i.e. evidence that might seem to contradict your argument) is considered and convincingly refuted.
























8.5


to >6.5


Pts



Highly Competent



Evidence used to support the central point is well chosen, though not particularly rich or detailed. The connection between argument and evidence is clearly articulated. (Where applicable) Some opposing evidence is considered and refuted.
























6.5


to >5.0


Pts



Fairly Competent:



Connection between argument and evidence is not clearly articulated in all cases.
























5


to >0


Pts



Not Yet Competent



Evidence used does not clearly support the main argument. (and/or…) (Where applicable) Important opposing evidence is ignored, thereby weakening the central argument.


















10pts


















This criterion is linked to a learning outcome





Evidence and referencing


Relevant and contemporary literature resourced and utilised to support discussion.
Appropriate referencing style.




























































10Pts



Excellent.



Excellent range of relevant, contemporary and appropriate literature resourced and integrated into discussion. Appropriately formatted Reference list provided. No errors in referencing and no unreferenced claims.
























8.4Pts



Very Good



Very good range of relevant, contemporary and appropriate literature resourced and used well to support discussion. Appropriately formatted Reference list provided with only minor errors in referencing.
























7.4Pts



Good



Good range of relevant and contemporary literature resourced and used to support discussion. Reference list provided with some errors in referencing.
























6.4Pts



Adequate



Adequate range of relevant, contemporary and appropriate literature resourced and used to support discussion. Quality of references may be questionable. Reference list provided but multiple errors in either in-text references and/or reference list.
























4.9Pts



Unsatisfactory



Unsatisfactory range of literature resourced and / or inappropriate literature resourced. Discussion not supported by literature / references lacking. Incorrect referencing style .


















10pts


















This criterion is linked to a learning outcome





Format, Writing, Presentation and Word limit


Essay style written assignment with clear introduction, body and conclusion; Correct grammar, spelling, punctuation and syntax; Presentation / formatting guidelines and word limit adhered to; Appropriate capitalisation and use of culturally sensitive language as taught in this unit.




























































5Pts



Excellent



Presentation as per instructions, essay format with clear introduction, body and conclusion; Excellent standard of academic writing with correct grammar, spelling and syntax. Adheres to the Word limit +/- 10%
























4.25Pts



Very good



Presentation according to instructions; minor issues with essay format; few errors with grammar, syntax, punctuation, and spelling, Minor editing and revision required. Adheres to the Word limit +/- 10%
























3.25Pts



Good



Presentation according to instructions; some issues with essay format; Some errors with grammar, syntax, punctuation, and spelling limited editing and revision required Adheres to the Word limit +/- 10%
























2.25Pts



Adequate



Presentation according to instructions; many issues with essay format; Many errors with grammar, syntax, punctuation, and spelling. Adheres to the Word limit +/- 10%
























2Pts



Unsatisfactory



Not presented according to instructions and / or substantial errors with essay format / grammar, syntax, punctuation, and spelling and/or word count not adhered to.


















5pts









Total points:45











Answered 2 days AfterApr 26, 2024

Answer To: Assessment 3Start...

P answered on Apr 28 2024
6 Votes
A reflective essay on holistic approach to promote Aboriginal Health
The comprehensive comprehension of wellbeing inside Native people group, as expressed by the Public Native Wellbeing Methodology (1989), rises above ordinary definitions to envelop social, close to home, and social aspects. This multi-layered approach perceives that prosperity is unpredictably connected to the safeguarding and articulation of social character. As of late, a ris
ing collection of contemporary examination has enlightened the significant impact of social personality on the wellbeing value of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people groups.
Physical dimension
Obviously, actual wellbeing is a principal part of Aboriginal well-being. Notwithstanding, measurements uncover an unsettling difference among Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal Australians regarding wellbeing results. The Australian Foundation of Wellbeing and Government assistance (AIHW) reports that Native and Torres Waterway Islander people groups experience a higher weight of ongoing infections like diabetes, coronary illness, and respiratory sicknesses contrasted with the more extensive populace (AIHW, 2023). These abberations are established in different variables, including social determinants of wellbeing like destitution, deficient lodging, and restricted admittance to socially proper medical care administrations (Perusing, 2017). For example, research by the Social Determinants of Wellbeing and Value Organization (SDHEN) (2015) features the connection among neediness and restricted admittance to quality food decisions. This can prompt a higher gamble of heftiness and constant illnesses like diabetes. Likewise, the absence of socially safe medical services conditions can prompt Native individuals feeling estranged and reluctant to look for precaution care (Dudgeon et al., 2013)
The interconnection between the social and profound prosperity
The NAHS definition reaches out past the actual domain, perceiving the basic job of social and profound prosperity in Native wellbeing. Native societies are portrayed by areas of strength for an of local area and association with genealogical land (Dudgeon et al., 2014). Connection frameworks and local area life are vital to Native character and prosperity (Parker and Milroy, 2014). Nonetheless, verifiable injury brought about by dispossession, constrained osmosis, and progressing social underestimation significantly affects social and profound prosperity (Dudgeon et al., 2014).
The impacts of intergenerational injury, went down through families and networks, are clear in higher paces of psychological wellness issues and substance maltreatment inside Native populaces (Parker and Milroy, 2014). Tending to these difficulties requires an all-encompassing methodology that thinks about the verifiable setting and the significance of social association and social personality in healing.
Impact of culture
Culture goes about as the foundation of Aboriginal health. Conventional information frameworks, otherworldly convictions, and association with the land are not simply social practices; they are principal parts of wellbeing and prosperity (Lowitja Institute, 2019). These practices advance a feeling of personality, having a place, and reason, all of which add to profound and otherworldly prosperity (Dudgeon et al., 2014). Research by Dudgeon et al. (2014) proposes that deficiency of association with culture and conventional lifestyles has been connected to less fortunate wellbeing results.
For example, studies have shown that taking part in conventional practices like services and association with Nation can decidedly affect emotional wellness and by and large prosperity (Dudgeon et al., 2014). Perceiving and integrating social practices into medical care conveyance is critical. The Canadian Foundations of Wellbeing Exploration (CIHR) (2018) underscores the significance of socially safe medical care that regards customary mending rehearses and incorporates them with standard medication.
Holistic approach
The NAHS definition features the interconnectedness of these aspects. Atkinson et al. (2017) delineate this by bringing up what poor actual wellbeing can mean for an individual's capacity to take part in friendly and social exercises. Social segregation and profound pain can compound actual medical issues. Injury and social disengagement can prompt social issues - a mind boggling trap of difficulties that require an all encompassing way to...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here