Assessment Three: Narrated PowerPoint PresentationType:PresentationWeighting:40%Method:IndependentLength:Total presentation length is to be 7 to 10 minutesSubmission...

1 answer below »









Assessment Three: Narrated PowerPoint Presentation







Type:Presentation







Weighting:


40%







Method:


Independent







Length:


Total presentation length is to be 7 to 10 minutes







Submission type:


Video file (.mp4 or .mov)








Assessment description




The purpose of the assignment is to expand students' understanding of digital health and innovation in healthcare practice. Furthermore, this Power Point presentation will enhance students' research presentation skills that will prepare them to communicate their research project in national and international conferences. This assessment will be focused on:




Module 7: Digital health and promoting innovation in healthcare




Module 8: Translation of evidence




Assessment instructions




1. Search the health databases using University of Canberra Library site




2. Use these keywords to find research paper: Nurs* AND any of the following keywords:




Clinical decision support systems OR Digital health literacy OR electronic health record OR health information system for nurses OR Telehealth.




3. Your search must look like this Nurs* AND "Clinical decision support systems"




4. Include screenshot of the search you used such as:




IScreenshot 2023-08-23 at 10.37.15 am.png





5. Select one (1) research paper that examines digital health in nursing (cannot be the same as paper used for AT2)




6. Research papers must be published within 5 years and published in english language.




7. No methodology restriction - Qual, Quan, Mixed-methods, RCT and SR are eligible. No editorial and discussion papers please! this paper must be peer-reviewed




8. Present your critique of the research using the UC PPT template (provided below).




9. Imagine you are presenting this research paper at a nursing conference




10. Record your voice over the PPT to explain to the audience in your own words:







  • How the study was conducted?



  • Critique the methods used to answer the research question



  • What were the findings?



  • Why are the findings significant to the nursing profession?



  • How does the research findings translate in nursing practice?



  • Provide suggestions about the potential for future research based on the topic






11. Maximum of 10 slides - 7 - 10 Minutes.




12. Submit the presentation on Canvas.




























Target Audience








New Graduate Nurses and Registered Nurses




__________________________




The presentation is to be a total of (10) slides, including a title slide and reference slide (for the selected article). Any content presented after (10) minutes, will not be marked. Penalties related to duration will be applied in line with the marking rubric provided on canvas. Students are strongly encouraged to avoid presentations that do not meet the minimum duration of (7) minutes, it is unlikely that the assessment will address the requirements of the assessment as set out in the marking rubric.




























Rubric and University of Canberra PPT template











You can access the Rubric from here





AT3 Rubric 11851 - FINAL .pdf








Download AT3 Rubric 11851 - FINAL .pdf

















You can access the UC PPT slides here





PPT Presentation - UC template .pptx








Download PPT Presentation - UC template .pptx














____________________________________________________________________







Students are required to submit both:











  1. The PowerPoint presentation into canvas as a video assessment.














  • Students are required to save their assessment using one of the following file extensions .mp4 or .mov








  • Please save your submission as STUDENTID_11851_AT3











For additional enquiries and support, students are encouraged to make a time to meet anASK (Academic Skills and Knowledge) AdvisorLinks to an external site.





.












  1. A copy of their transcript with relevant citations.














  • Students are required to save their assessment using the following file extension .docx








  • Please save your submission as STUDENTID_11851_AT3_Transcript for example u123456_11851_AT3_Transcript








  • This component is to be submitted to Ouriginal for text matching purposes.Please note this assessment will be reviewed by the University’s plagiarism checking software (Ouriginal) and, with reasonable grounds, be subject to further inquiry through the Office of the Associate Dean of Education.







  • Adhere to APA7th referencing style



  • Cover sheet withUC ID and presentation title



  • Students' names are not to be included on any assessment tasks/submissions. Only student ID numbers should be included (as per theAssessment Policy


    and


    Assessment Procedures).



  • Please note this assessment will be reviewed by the University’s plagiarism checking software (Ouriginal) and, with reasonable grounds, be subject to further inquiry through the Office of the Associate Dean of Education.







______________________________










Students are encouraged to submit this assessment before the due date and time, to allow sufficient time for students to seek support in the event that they experience technical difficulties when finalising their assessment. Students who identify that they require assistance or who experience any technical difficulties must contact the University of Canberra Digital Information and Technology Management (DITM) support service. This service is available Monday to Friday (0600-2200hrs) and weekends (1300-1700hrs). Students may also elect to visit the IT service Counter for technology-related questions and problems, this service is available in Building 1, level B (1000-1400hrs) during the semester.








________________________________




Support resources




If you’re facing extenuating circumstances that are affecting your ability to complete an assignment on time, you canapply for an extension.Your assignment extension request will be considered, and you’ll be notified of the outcome via your student email account.




If you are looking for more information about support and requirements for completing your assessments, review the


Studying at UC: Resources for Students


page as this connects you with a wider range of information and services available to you as a UC student.




If you have a question about this assessment, please post it on the Assessment Q&A discussion.




Submission details




To submit, select the 'Start Assignment' button which will then allow you to upload the files you need to submit.




Below are some general FAQ guides to support you in completing this task:




Remove/add relevant submission guides here






















Rubric













AT3 Rubric














































































































































































































AT3 Rubric





CriteriaRatingsPts












This criterion is linked to a learning outcome





Selection of research paper


- Research paper (with data collection and data analysis)
- Article focused on digital health in nursing profession
- Published in the last 5 years






















































5


Pts



Outstanding - HD



Meets all of the selection criteria for this assessment
























2.5


Pts



2.5 satisfactory - P



2.5 Pts Satisfactory - P Meets some of the selection criteria for this assessment (1 or 2 errors in the selection of the paper)
























0


Pts



0 Unsatisfactory - NX



No article selected The selected article is NOT focused on digital health in nursing profession Invalid article was selected and published > 5 years has not sufficiently met the selection criteria for the assessment


















5


pts


















This criterion is linked to a learning outcome





Search strategy


- Clearly stated the health/nursing/medical database searched to allocate the search article
- Used the provided keywords to search for evidence
- Screenshot of the search strategy is included with clear search strategy






















































5


Pts



5 Outstanding - HD



Meets all requirements for this criteria for this assessment
























2.5


Pts



2.5 - satisfactory - P



Meets some requirements for this criteria (1 or 2 errors)
























0


Pts



0 Unsatisfactory - NX



Has not met the requirements for this criteria


















5


pts


















This criterion is linked to a learning outcome





Aim and methodology


- Describes how the study was conducted
- States the purpose/aim of the study
- Appraise the research method used to answer the RQ




























































5





to >4.19





Pts



Outstanding - HD



Outstanding description of the aim and the methodology, including how the study was conducted with jus2fica2on of why the methodology is appropriate for the research question. The appraisal includes evidence informed recommendations for alternative methodological approaches and/or limitations of the approach used indicatng depth of understanding.
























4.19





to >3.69





Pts



Superior - D



Superior description of the aim and the methodology, including how the study was conducted with justification of why the methodology is appropriate for the research question. The appraisal includes evidence informed recommendations for alternative methodological approaches or limitations of the approach used.
























3.69





to >3.19





Pts



Good - C



Good description of the aim and the methodology, including how the study was conducted with justification of why the methodology is appropriate for the research question. The appraisal identifies some limitations of the approach used.
























3.19





to >2.48





Pts



Satisfactory - P



Satisfactory description of the aim and the methodology, including how the study was conducted with justification of why the methodology is appropriate for the research question, indicating a basic level of understanding of research methods concepts.
























2.48





to >0





Pts



Unsatisfactory - NX



Unsatisfactory description of the aim and the methodology, including how the study was conducted with justification of why the methodology is appropriate for the research question. Insufficient understanding of research concepts presented.


















5


pts


















This criterion is linked to a learning outcome





Nursing profession


- Summarise the research findings and describe why theses are significant to nursing




























































5





to >4.19





Pts



Outstanding - HD



Excellent and comprehensive explanation of the findings of the selected study, with a sophisticated and well- informed justification of the significance to the nursing profession, integrating other literature that supports analysis
























4.19





to >3.69





Pts



Superior - D



Very good explanation of the findings of the selected study, with a sound jus2fica2on of the significance to the nursing profession integrating other literature that supports analysis
























3.69





to >3.19





Pts



Good - C



Good explanation of the findings of the selected study with a clear jus2fica2on of the significance to the nursing profession with reference to other literature that supports this analysis
























3.19





to >2.48





Pts



Satisfactory - P



Satisfactory explanation of the findings of the selected study and with a basic justification presented for the significance to the nursing profession, this may be generic and/or offer little further informed analysis beyond what is presented in the chosen paper.
























2.48





to >0





Pts



Unsatisfactory - NX



Unsatisfactory explanation of the findings of the selected study no clear justification of the significance to the nursing profession


















5


pts


















This criterion is linked to a learning outcome





Translation of evidence


- How do the research findings translate in nursing practice?



- Provide suggestions about the potential for future research based on the topic / or make independent suggestions




























































5





to >4.19





Pts



Outstanding - HD



Outstanding explanation of how the findings of the research paper translate into nursing practice with logical suggestion of research ideas based on the selected topic
























4.19





to >3.69





Pts



Superior - D



Superior explanation of how the findings of the research paper translate into nursing practice with logical suggestion of research idea based on the selected topic
























3.69





to >3.19





Pts



Good - C



Good explanation of how the findings of the research paper translate into nursing practice with logical suggestion of research idea based on the selected topic
























3.19





to >2.48





Pts



Satisfactory - P



Satisfactory explanation of how the findings of the research paper translate into nursing practice with logical suggestion of research idea based on the selected topic
























2.48





to >0





Pts



Unsatisfactory - NX



Unsatisfactory explanation of how the findings of the research paper translate into nursing practice with logical suggestion of research idea based on the selected topic


















5


pts


















This criterion is linked to a learning outcome





Presentation Quality: Audio


Presentation reflects the requirements of the assessment instructions including but not limited to clarity of spoken communication, time adherence, speed and delivery of narration.




























































2.5





to >2.0





Pts



Outstanding - HD



Outstanding presentation that reflects the requirements of the assessment instructions. No error or omissions
























2





to >1.5





Pts



Superior - D



Superior presentation that reflects the requirements of the assessment instructions in relation. Minor errors or areas for improvement noted.
























1.5





to >1.0





Pts



Good - C



Good presentation that reflects the requirements of the assessment instructions for the most part. Further practice at oral delivery of content would strengthen your work.
























1





to >0.5





Pts



Satisfactory - P



Satisfactory presentation that reflects the requirements of the assessment somewhat. Further practice at oral delivery of content, particularly speech pace OR pronunciation of key terms, would strengthen your work
























0.5





to >0





Pts



Unsatisfactory - NX



Unsatisfactory presentation of student work. Clarity of spoken word hinders communication of ideas. Further practice at oral delivery of content, particularly speech pace AND/OR pronunciation of key terms would strengthen your work.


















2.5


pts


















This criterion is linked to a learning outcome





Visual elements


Clear presentation of information on each PowerPoint slide, with consideration given to graphic design including use of colour, fonts and imagery.




























































2.5





to >2.0





Pts



Outstanding - HD



Outstanding PowerPoint slides which add contextual information and support the narration to an outstanding level.
























2





to >1.5





Pts



Superior - D



Superior PowerPoint slides which add contextual information and support the narration to a superior level.
























1.5





to >1.0





Pts



Good - C



Good quality PowerPoint slides which add contextual information and support the narration to a level of good quality.
























1





to >0.5





Pts



Satisfactory - P



Satisfactory PowerPoint slides which add contextual information and support the narration to a satisfactory level.
























0.5





to >0





Pts



Unsatisfactory - NX



Unsatisfactory PowerPoint slides which add limited contextual information. There is unsatisfactory support of the narration.


















2.5


pts


















This criterion is linked to a learning outcome





Scholarly approach


to the identification and integration of evidence to inform arguments, support definitions and an ethical approach to using the ideas and academic work of others. Key points identified for the audience in the PowerPoint and narration content are evidenced by high-quality peer reviewed academic sources




























































5





to >4.19





Pts



Outstanding - HD



Outstanding use of evidence to inform arguments, support definitions and adhere to an ethical approach when using the ideas and work of others. Both PowerPoint and narration are evidenced to an outstanding standard with no errors or omissions.
























4.19





to >3.69





Pts



Superior - D



Superior use of evidence to inform arguments, support definitions and adhere to an ethical approach when using the ideas and work of others. Both PowerPoint and narration are evidenced to an outstanding standard with minor/infrequent errors or omissions which do not detract from the academic validity of the presentation.
























3.69





to >3.19





Pts



Good - C



Good use of evidence to inform arguments, support definitions and adhere to an ethical approach when using the ideas and work of others. Both PowerPoint and narration are evidenced to a good standard with some errors and/or omissions which minorly detract from the academic validity of the presentation.
























3.19





to >2.48





Pts



Satisfactory - P



Satisfactory use of evidence to inform arguments, support definitions and adhere to an ethical approach when using the ideas and work of others. Both PowerPoint and narration are evidenced to a satisfactory standard with frequent errors and/or omissions which detract from the academic validity of the presentation.
























2.48





to >0





Pts



Unsatisfactory - NX



Unsatisfactory use of evidence to inform arguments, support definitions and adhere to an ethical approach when using the ideas and work of others. Both PowerPoint and narration lack evidence with consistent and significant errors and/or omissions which seriously detract from the academic validity of the presentation.


















5


pts


















This criterion is linked to a learning outcome





Academic approach


Follows conventional academic approach - including academic language, grammar, spelling, punctuation and syntax.




























































2.5





to >2.0





Pts



Outstanding - HD



Outstanding adherence to academic language principles including (but not limited to) spelling, grammar, punctuation, and terminology.
























2





to >1.5





Pts



Superior - D



Superior adherence to academic language principles including (but not limited to) spelling, grammar, punctuation, and terminology.
























1.5





to >1.0





Pts



Good - C



Good adherence to academic language principles including (but not limited to) spelling, grammar, punctuation, and terminology.
























1





to >0.5





Pts



Satisfactory - P



Satisfactory adherence to academic language principles including (but not limited to) spelling, grammar, punctuation, and terminology.
























0.5





to >0





Pts



Unsatisfactory - NX



Unsatisfactory adherence to academic language principles including (but not limited to) spelling, grammar, punctuation, and terminology.


















2.5


pts


















This criterion is linked to a learning outcome





UC APA7th Referencing


Adherence to APA 7th edition reference style.




























































2.5





to >2.0





Pts



Outstanding - HD



Outstanding adherence to APA 7th edition with no errors or omissions.
























2





to >1.5





Pts



Superior - D



Superior adherence to APA 7th edition with minimal, minor errors or omissions.
























1.5





to >1.0





Pts



Good - C



Good adherence to APA 7th edition with some errors or omissions.
























1





to >0.5





Pts



Satisfactory - P



Satisfactory adherence to APA 7th edition with frequent errors or omissions.
























0.5





to >0





Pts



Unsatisfactory - NX



Unsatisfactory adherence to APA 7th edition with no errors or omissions


















2.5


pts









Total points:


4











Answered Same DayOct 18, 2023

Answer To: Assessment Three: Narrated PowerPoint...

Deblina answered on Oct 19 2023
22 Votes
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here