can you please make sure this assessment is not written with the help of AI

1 answer below »
can you please make sure this assessment is not written with the help of AI


Assessment 3: Case Study Response (30%) In this assessment task, you will read a case study and respond according to the task outline below. Title: Assessment Task 3: Case Study Written Responses Unit learning outcomes: 1,3,4,5 Weighting: 30% Length: 1500 words Due date: (AEST) Sunday of Week 10 Type: Report Submission: Submission via Turnitin Assessment instructions You will have access to a case study in Week 4. You are required to read the case study and respond by applying one of the models or frameworks of anti-oppressive practice discussed in week 7 or aspects of the SHARP framework. You will need to explore the role of power and privilege in the case study, aspects of diversity that are relevant and a reflection on your identity and position and how it does or not impact on your position.  You need your written response to be in a report format. It is important to look at the assessment rubric to understand how you are being marked for this assessment.  To complete this task To complete this task you have to select one of the two case studies provided. You then need to create a response to the case study.  This Case Study written response needs to be in a report format  will be 1500 words in length (including in-text citations but not the reference list). The report should: · include at least 7 scholarly journal articles as well as some of the relevant weekly textbook references. · adhere to the course formatting guidelines - these are listed in the assessment section on your unit site. · use APA 7 referencing The case study written response will be written in a report formal academic style with a · Cover page · Contents page · A selected model or framework of oppressive practice.  · Part one: Aspects of diversity and barriers to inclusion. · Part two: Power and privilege · Part three: Reflection & position · The conclusion will summarise your key points.  Adherence to the course formatting guidelines (e.g. spacing, font, coversheet, wordcount) is essential; these are listed in the Assessment section on your unit site. APA 7 referencing is required. Supporting resources See your prescribed textbook chapters, utilise Stotts College library and Google scholar to access peer reviewed resources. I have provided you with some prompting questions to assist you in completing your case study written response. You do not need to include the questions in your report. They are simply prompts to guide you in what is important to cover.  Introduction Name and describe the anti oppressive framework or model, its purpose and how  you will apply it to the case study ( refer to  week 7 learning materials). (400 words) Part 1: Aspects of diversity and barriers to inclusion (300 words) What aspects of diversity are relevant in this case study? Are there any intersectional identities at play? What oppressive factors are at play? Are there any stereotypes/prejudice, micro-aggressions or types of discrimination taking place? Part 2: Power and Privilege (350 words) How is power and powerlessness represented here?  What types and modes of power are at play in the case study?  What privileges are at play in this case study? What could the individual do alone or with others to regain power?  Do you think it is up to the clients to change the situation? Do the clients need help to challenge some of the oppressive structures impacting on them? Do you have any thoughts on how to go about the changes?  Part 3: Reflection & position (350 words)  How different or similar are you to the people in this case study? (ie gender, age, ethnicity, etc) How might your own personal history impact your view of the issues in the case study? What makes you uncomfortable about this case study if anything?  What do you think is a socially just response to this situation? Case Study 1 Zainab is a 24-year-old law student. She grew up in Lakemba in New South Wales and moved to Glebe when she was 18. Zainab began a relationship with a fellow university student, Sam, when she was 19. Zainab and Sam were together for almost 3 years. During their relationship, Zainab and Sam consensually photographed several of their sexual encounters. They considered it a fun way to express their affection for each other, and they enjoyed re-visiting the images when they were apart. Towards the end of their relationship, Sam started acting quite jealous. He threatened to distribute the photographs of Zainab to her family, friends and around the university if she left him for anyone else. Zainab was fearful of the implications of this for her future career prospects as a lawyer and the humiliation it would cause her Muslim family. For these reasons, she stayed in the relationship with Sam for another 6 months, before they eventually broke up. Sam promised Zainab that he had deleted the photos. One day Zainab was at work when she was approached by two men with cameras who tried to take photographs of her. She had to hide out the back of the café, and her boss suggested they report it to police. She didn’t want to do this. Later that week, a student from her course approached Zainab and told her she had seen sexual images of her on a Tumblr page. She said the image was accompanied by what appeared to be her home and work address, alongside some horrific comments encouraging others to film sexual and physical assaults of her. The student showed Zainab the site and it contained several of the photographs she had taken with Sam. Zainab was terrified and approached your community service organisation for counselling support and to find out what she can do to empower herself as she feels like this is all her fault and is not sure she can live with the shame that this will bring on her family and the broader community if more people find out. She is concerned that this may impact her employment opportunities in the future. You have been working on a respect campaign to deal with violence in the local community. Case Study 2 Kevin is a 32 year old Australian community services worker on a project team to set up a scheme for supportive housing for recovering mentally ill people aged 18-25. Kevin and his team have worked closely with their clients and relatives in the area who supported setting up the housing scheme. A wealthy lady who had lived in the area had died and left five units to be used as a part of the scheme in her will. The local area has the majority of people owning their own homes with a small number of rentals and some existing social housing. It is located near the inner city with good public transport and is now a highly sort after location. Kevin is excited because it means his clients will be able to get to appointments easy and strengthens their job prospects. However, many residents in the area have come together in a campaign to stop the project because they feel it will bring more difficult people to the area. Some are angry because there is currently a housing crisis in the area where good people who work and pay taxes are having trouble accessing rental properties. Your clients and their relatives are upset as the work and pay taxes too. Kevin has noticed that since the rise of the community tension the mental health of some of his clients has started to decline and some are no longer coming to the meetings about the housing project. Two of them have pulled out of the project even though it would mean they would no longer be homeless if they stayed with the project. ASSESSMENT 3 Due: Sunday 26th November · Case Study Written Responses · 1500-1800 words · Type:  Report e.g. headings required, bullet points allowed, introduction and conclusion · Reference list: Minimum of 7 references ASSESSMENT INSTRUCTIONS · You will have access to a case study in Week 4.   · You are required to read the case study and respond by applying one of the models or frameworks of anti-oppressive practice discussed in week 7 or aspects of the SHARP framework. You will need to explore:  · The role of power and privilege in the case study; · Aspects of diversity that are relevant to the case study · A reflection on your identity and position and how it does or does not impact on your position. · You need your written response to be in a report format. TO COMPLETE THE TASK · You need to select ONE of two case studies provided.  You then need to create a response to the case study. · This case study written response needs to be in a report format and will be 1500-1800 words (including the in-text references, but not the reference list).  The report should: · Include at least 7 academic literature articles and/or journals as well as the relevant weekly textbook references. · References shown both in-text and reference list.  Reference list is a separate page at the end of the report. REPORT STRUCTURE · Adhere to the course formatting guidelines – these are listed in the assessment section on your unit site. · Use APA7 referencing · Reports require HEADINGS (formatted APA7) and you may use bullet points to better explain the information. · Introduction: Name and describe the anti -oppressive framework or model, it’s purpose and how you will apply it to the case study. SUPPORTING RESOURCES Part 1: Aspects of diversity and barriers to inclusion: · What aspects of diversity are relevant in this case study? · Are there any intersectional identifies at play? · What oppressive factors are at play? · Are there any stereotypes/prejudice, micro-aggressions or types of discrimination taking place? Part 2: Power and Privilege: · How is power and powerlessness represented here? · What types and modes of power are at play in the case study? · What privileges are at play in this case study? · What could the individual do alone or with others to regain power? · Do you think it is up to the clients to change the situation? Do the clients need help to challenge some of the oppressive structures impacting on them? Do you have any thoughts on how to go about the changes? Part 3: Reflection and Position · How different or similar are you to the people in this case study? (i.e. gender, age, ethnicity, etc) · How might your own personal history impact your view of the issues in the case study? · What makes you uncomfortable about this case study if anything? · What do you think is a socially just response to this situation? · Conclusion:  A summary of what has been covered (no new information) · Reference list:  New page, formatted APA7 e.g. hanging indent, alphabetical order, centred heading “References”.
Answered Same DayNov 23, 2023

Answer To: can you please make sure this assessment is not written with the help of AI

Bidusha answered on Nov 24 2023
16 Votes
Case Study Analysis        2
CASE STUDY ANALYSIS
Table of Contents
Introduction    3
Part 1: Aspects of diversity and barriers to inclusion    4
Part 2: Power and Privilege    5
Part 3: Reflection & position    7
References    9
Introduction
The subject of this contextual investigation is Zainab, a 24-year-old regulation understudy who as of late gotten dangers threatening to uncover her con
fidential pictures to her companions, family, and the college if she said a final farewell to her accomplice. This contextual analysis will explore the utilization of the SHARP framework to recognize and address the social, authentic, and foundational perspectives that add to oppressive ways of behaving and frameworks to enable Zainab and address the basic reasons for oppression and violence. On account of her social class, orientation, and religion, Zainab is dependent upon fundamental segregation. She is a female regulation understudy from a low-pay family who rehearses Islam. Her fragility in the situation she winds up in is a consequence of these things. Zainab's experience is altogether formed by her community's authentic foundation. For example, she examines the recurrence of violence against ladies, the absence of help open, and the segregation she encounters because of her strict way of life as a Muslim at a college setting. Her current conditions have been impacted by every one of these causes. In this occasion, the community service association's capability is to assist Zainab with guiding so she might foster the solidarity to face the issue and guard herself (Tedam, 2021). The SHARP framework is an enemy of oppressive framework intended to pinpoint and handle the hidden reasons for violence and oppression. It is an instrument for understanding and tending to the verifiable, social, and primary components that help oppressive establishments and ways of behaving. With the assistance of this framework, professionals and clients may all the more successfully perceive and determine primary issues and oppressive approaches. The underlying oppression, authentic setting, role analysis, correspondence and commonality, and power are the five components that make up the SHARP framework (Shaia, 2019). Specialists can involve this framework as an instrument to all the more likely figure out the verifiable, social, and primary components that lead to oppressive foundations and ways of behaving. This can help associations in creating procedures to definitively address these worries by embracing a diverse way to deal with perceiving the specific ways that oppression influences different people and gatherings. Community service associations might make strategies and projects that effectively advance consideration and security while working on the standards of regard and uniformity by using the SHARP framework (Shaia, 2019). Associations can recognize and establish systems and arrangements that are expected to decrease the impacts of oppression and bias by utilizing this methodology. For this situation study, I will utilizing the SHARP framework to examine Zainab's conditions and explore how every component may be used to empower her to plan a methodology to manage the primary issues and oppressive strategies she is facing.
Part 1: Aspects of diversity and barriers to inclusion
Parts of variety found for the situation study incorporate gender, age, sexual orientation, identity, and religion. Zainab, a 24-year-old Muslim woman, is seeing Sam, one more understudy at the foundation, in an equivalent sex relationship. She is a regulation understudy too, which underscores her financial standing and level of instruction. Diverse personalities are characters made out of a few components that meet up to shape an unmistakable and multi-layered personality. Gender, color, class, sexual orientation,...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here