First file is rubric with the informations which needs to be linked with the second file (same topic). And third file is the feedback as this is my retake course and I have done the same assignment last year.
Master of Public Health Page 1 of 4 HSYP8104 Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Session 1 2021 Task title Assessment Task 2: Health promotion program Due date Week 8, Friday 30th April 5PM Weighting 40% Format/length Written- 2000 words (+/-10%) Presentation- 3 minutes (+/- 30 sec.) Reference style Vancouver https://libguides.mq.edu.au/referencing/Vancouver Unit learning outcomes 1. Explain health promotion concepts and principles in planning and practice; 2. Analyse the range of factors that influence the health of individuals and populations, including social determinants of health and lifestyle behaviours; 3. Identify and critically analyse the range of theoretical and practical intervention frameworks available for disease prevention and health promotion delivery within a specific population/community; 4. Design and evaluate health promotion strategies to demonstrate effective application of key principles and theoretical models of health promotion. Submission iLearn Turnitin Return of grade & feedback iLearn Turnitin (individual) In class (group) Background The purpose of program planning is to design a program that addresses the established health issue within available resources. Program planning and communication skills are core to health promotion practice. Therefore, this assessment task aims to help you to develop skills required in developing and implementing health promotion programs and advance your presentation skills. You will need to develop a health promotion program based on the current health issue you chose for your Assessment Task 1. In addition, you will create a video presentation- Pitch for Funding- based on your health promotion program. Note: If you would like to change your topic, please seek approval from the Unit Convenor. Description Health promotion program First, based on the feedback provided for your health promotion program plan (AT1), adjust your health promotion program as required. You may need to collect more information. However, you can use the information you provided for AT1. Your health promotion program must provide the rationale and outline the evidence base for the program that includes the following: 1. Introduction a. Describe and justify the importance of your chosen public health issue; b. Describe your chosen target audience. 2. Health promotion program a. Describe your health promotion program and explain how your program is supposed to change behaviour referring to suitable behaviour change model/framework; https://libguides.mq.edu.au/referencing/Vancouver Master of Public Health Page 2 of 4 b. Include program logic model (aim, inputs, activities, outputs, impacts and outcomes). For example: c. Describe your action and implementation plan with timelines (use Gannt chart); d. Identify resources needed for your program (no budget calculation is needed); e. Describe your communication strategy. 3. References: minimum requirement ≥ 15 recent academic resources. Pitch for funding You will need to prepare a 3-minute presentation (pitch for funding) based on your health promotion program (written document). The aim of your presentation is to persuade others to fund your program. You will start by introducing your topic and why it is an important public health issue, target audience and then you will explain how your program may help to address this issue. Also, you may emphasise how your program is different from the other programs. You can use visuals or any other prompts, it is your presentation and you can do with your 3 minutes as you wish. Remember, the aim is to get ‘funding’, so your speech should be persuasive! Please note that you need to be present in your presentation not just your voice. Once your presentation is ready, you will need to submit it via VoiceThread. Resources are provided on how to use VoiceThread on iLearn under AT2. The teaching staff and students will provide their constructive feedback on VoiceThread, so please engage in the discussions and provide your feedback on other students’ presentations. Master of Public Health Page 3 of 4 Rubric/marking criteria Assessment Task 2: Health promotion program Assessment Component Outstanding High Distinction (100%-85%) Advanced Distinction (84%-75%) Proficient Credit (74%-65%) Functional Pass (64%-50%) Developing Fail (49%-0%) Description & justification of your chosen public health issue and target audience (10 marks) Submission demonstrates a very high-level understanding and justification of the public health issue with reference to relevant literature. Submission demonstrates a very high-level justification of the target audience with reference to relevant literature. Submission demonstrates very good understanding and justification of the public health issue with reference to relevant literature. Submission demonstrates very good justification of the target audience with reference to relevant literature. Submission demonstrates good understanding and justification of the public health issue with reference to some relevant literature. Submission demonstrates good justification of the target audience with reference to some relevant literature. Submission demonstrates satisfactory understanding and justification of the public health issue with reference to some relevant literature. Submission demonstrates satisfactory justification of the target audience with reference to some relevant literature. Submission demonstrates very little (or no) understanding and justification of the public health issue with reference to some or no literature. Submission demonstrates very little (or no) justification of the target audience with reference to some or no literature. Explanation of how the campaign is supposed to change behaviour including theoretical context (10 marks) Submission demonstrates high-level understanding and application of health promotion theories and frameworks in explaining and justifying how the campaign is supposed to change behaviour. Submission demonstrates very good understanding and application of health promotion theories and frameworks in explaining and justifying how the campaign is supposed to change behaviour. Submission demonstrates good understanding and application of health promotion theories and frameworks in explaining and justifying how the campaign is supposed to change behaviour. Submission demonstrates satisfactory understanding and application of health promotion theories and frameworks in explaining and justifying how the campaign is supposed to change behaviour. Submission demonstrates very little (or no) understanding and application of health promotion theories and frameworks in explaining and justifying how the campaign is supposed to change behaviour. Program logic model (10 marks) Program logic model shows an excellent understanding of relationship between inputs, activities, outputs, impacts and outcomes. Aim(s) and objectives are clear and achievable (SMART). Program logic model shows a very good understanding of relationship between inputs, activities, outputs, impacts and outcomes. Aim(s) and objectives are clear and achievable (SMART) but with minor errors. Program logic model shows a good understanding of relationship between inputs, activities, outputs, impacts and outcomes. Aim(s) and objectives are listed and reflect some SMART criteria. Program logic model shows some understanding of relationship between inputs, activities, outputs, impacts and outcomes. Aim(s) and objectives are listed but with major errors and do not reflect all criteria in SMART framework. Program logic model is not clear and does not show understanding of relationship between inputs, activities, outputs, impacts and outcomes. Aim(s) and objectives are not listed or if listed they are inappropriate and do not reflect SMART framework. Description of action and implementation plan (10 marks) Action and implementation plan use step by step approach. It includes tasks required with timeframe to achieve the campaign’s aims. Action and implementation plan use step by step approach. It includes tasks required with timeframe to achieve the campaign’s Action and implementation plan are included showing some sequence between actions required and timeframe but with errors. Action and implementation plan are included showing some sequence between actions required and timeframe but with major errors throughout. Action and implementation plan are not included or is not relevant. Master of Public Health Page 4 of 4 Assessment Component Outstanding High Distinction (100%-85%) Advanced Distinction (84%-75%) Proficient Credit (74%-65%) Functional Pass (64%-50%) Developing Fail (49%-0%) aims with some errors. Identification of resources and communication strategy (10 marks) Resources are well identified. It includes tangible and intangible resources. Communication strategy is well-thought-out. Most resources are identified. It includes most tangible and intangible resources. Communication strategy is described. Some resources are identified either tangible or intangible. Communication strategy is described but lack detail. Few resources are identified either tangible or intangible. Communication strategy is (not) included with some errors. No or very few resources are identified. Communication strategy is not included or is irrelevant. Pitch for funding (25 marks) Presentation is very well organised and have a logic flow. It provides a background information such as justification of the public health issue, description of the program and how it will change behaviour of a target audience. Communicated clearly with a powerful message. Captured and held the attention throughout using an original, clever or creative approach. Strong stage presence, eye contact and vocal range. Makes excellent use of supporting materials, such as audio visuals, graphics, effects etc to enhance the pitch. Presentation is organised and have a logic flow. It provides a background information such as justification of the public health issue, description of the program and how it will change behaviour of a target audience. Captured and held the attention most of the time. Presented an interesting “fact”. Some stage presence, eye contact and vocal range. Makes good use of supporting materials, such as audio visuals, graphics, effects etc to enhance the