I want to write about the Brexit and how that affects the legal framework of the European Union. The class in Transnational Litigation and International Arbitration. It needs to be update to the news...

Running Head: BREXIT        1
BREXIT         
BREXIT AND ITS EFFECTS ON THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK OF THE EUROPEAN UNION
Table of Contents
Introduction    3
How did the exit take place?    3
What the exit means for the laws adopted into the legal framework    4
Scotland's negativity    7
What "is going to be" UK’s further plans?    9
Would other countries follow?    10
Is it the beginning of the end?    12
Conclusion    12
References    14
Introduction
This current assignment is based on the popular election that was held in the year 2016 in the month of June. The popular election is commonly termed as Brexit. The work will first focus on how the exit of the United Kingdom (UK) has taken from the European Union (EU) and the various issues, which are associated with it. The next part of the work is stressed on the factors of the main laws, which are associated with the exit policy and structure. The third fact reflects on negative issues, which are associated with Scotland. Due to this exit, the assignment sums up the eventual further plans that the country will be following to cope with these matters and to improve the condition.
The concluding part stresses on the factors whether there is a will to the upcoming ways the country will follow. There remains a question behind this whether the other countries will lend their hands to this election or they stay behind and watch the entire show. The motive of the work is to show what the crisis persists after the withdrawal of the United Kingdom and elections strategies as well as accounts will be equally taken into view. The work will provide a suitable analysis whether it is beginning or the end or problems in the country.
How did the exit take place?
Brexit refers to the British exit from the domain of the European Union. The exit has taken place through an electorate vote, which can also be termed as the referendum. As suggested by Agarwal, Singh and Toshniwal (2018), this public vote has raised people from all over the city to involve themselves in the vote and to give their opinions. The eventual outcome of the vote, results in 18 million people going on the side of Brexit. The balance charts show that the people opted for Brexit is more than those remains back. Brexit people are 60% whereas those who stay back are 40|%.
The main cause of Brexit was that the laws and customs, which were followed by the European Union, were not acclaimed by Britain and there was an arousal of a conflict, which was seriously affecting the citizens of the country. The European Union is having the bondage of both economic and political unions that are involved in its work in many countries. They allow free shipping and trading facilities, which were consistently creating problems for the Britain to accept. The UK was the first country to leave the EU. The problems were also on the charges and budgets, which were allowed for products that were not acceptable to the UK (Hobolt, 2016).
As there was a seer communion between the UK and EU previously, so after the breakup the two sides will need to decide they will focus on the development of their needs in future. They are planning to settle their own laws and customs, which will contribute to the development of the country. However, after this Election Day, the United Kingdom will come to terms to go through a transition period and go through an eleven months transmission to abide by the rules of the EU and UK can settle their ways and customs.
What the exit means for the laws adopted into the legal framework
The exit of the United Kingdom from the shackles of the European Union has led to both a positive and the negative influences on the citizens of the country. Due to this changed situation, the government has come to the decision to set up two laws, which can help the society in a similar way as compared to the previous times. The two major laws are the litigation laws and the arbitrary laws, which are subsequently led to fit in the legal framework of the UK government. The term legal framework is mainly a series of documents that incorporates the legislation, regulations and many kinds of contracts that affects the principles of the society.
Litigation laws refer to the eventual rules and the orders that are included in solving the matters of disputes in the terms of court system. As suggested by Coffee (2018), this is associated with the cases of the tort. The main part of the law is that if any case concerning the legal matters comes in the category of the litigation, then the eventual person concerned with the lawsuit would solve the matters. In this, the case will triumph over the litigations policy and the laws will be granted. Moreover, additionally, the attorney who is concerned with a number of practices is supposedly detained. However, the matters would not be termed litigation if there were no perfect lawsuit.
The condition will be free, there will be no controversy and the parties will have proper agreements. Most non-litigation matters refer to the sales of the property and kind of business formations. The more familiar way to understand the litigation laws, as mentioned above, is to get accustomed with the preferred lawsuit, the civil jurisdiction and procedures that are going to apply in the terms and conditions of the society. The rules as forwarded by the litigation must satisfy the parties out there, with their positive and negative agreements. The litigation laws are being applied to Brexit. These litigation laws are helpful for the country from falling back.
The litigation laws are set up by the government of the United Kingdom to help the country from falling into crisis. The public voting has resulted in severe crisis for UK to cope up so the laws were settled to help remove the ills from society. The United Kingdom has taken advantage of the litigations laws of the country and used the laws to settle the condition after the breakage. Moreover, the UK government has the perfect lawsuit that is helping the country to improve their financial conditions. With these laws in the forefront, there is settlement for the “demand letter”, which has supposedly put in the forefront for the products and facilities to be made, which will be sent to the citizens of the country.
The litigation has given newer scopes and proposed to settle the condition and it led the parties of the country to have positive agreements between them in a justified manner (Danov, 2018). The parties are thinking to take control of the election policy as swiftly as possible and to help to provide the citizens the advantageous part of the laws. Litigation laws are being widely used by the United Kingdom to have a space in their existent political patterns and legislation policies and way the country has succeeded from their eventual crisis is the major source of discussion among the people from the counterparts of Britain.
This law brought forth a new revival of the country. As necessitated by Klingenberg, Schnucke and Xia (2017), an arbitrary law that has been incorporated by the governmental policy of the countries that is swayed by the mere will of the legislation. Besides, it is not founded in the nature of things, which are persistent. The arbitrary law chalks out the decision and action that are not put up on the small-established facts or knowledge. The laws are rather made up on the large opinions and agreements. Arbitrary decisions are not based on the presence of the legal procedures or...