In Miranda v. Arizona, the United States Supreme Court held that the police must inform suspects, before interrogation, of certain constitutional rights. These rights have become popularly known as...

1 answer below »

In Miranda v. Arizona, the United States Supreme Court held that the police must inform suspects, before interrogation, of certain constitutional rights. These rights have become popularly known as the Miranda rights. Under the Constitution, specifically the Fifth Amendment, persons accused of a crime, or held in suspicion of a crime, must be informed of their right to remain silent, their right to be represented by counsel, and must be told that any statements they make can and will be used against them as evidence.

Compare and contrast voluntary and involuntary confessions. How did the court apply these concepts to the Miranda decision? Provide and example of when a person is and is not in custody. Is there a difference between an interview and an interrogation? If a person waives his or her Miranda rights, how long is the waiver valid? Can a person change his or her mind? Can the police keep trying to get a suspect to talk until he or she agrees to do so without a lawyer? Should there be any exceptions to the rule that a person is to be informed of their rights? Discuss.

Needs to be 500 words

Answered 2 days AfterJun 23, 2022

Answer To: In Miranda v. Arizona, the United States Supreme Court held that the police must inform suspects,...

Tanmoy answered on Jun 26 2022

78 Votes

Last Name:    4
Name:
Professor:
Course:
Date:
Title: Miranda V. Arizona
Contents
Introduction    3
Analysis    3
Conclusion    4
Work Cited    5
Introduction
In most of the countries the states need to adhere to the different guidelines when it deals with voluntary and involuntary confession. The determining factor which will be accessible proofs will be the statement of confession. The confession which is obtained without applying any force to the suspect or by their own will is called voluntary confession. It is the 14th amendment which necessitates all the confessions to be voluntary in nature. on the contrary it is involuntary confession which consists of a person who is suspect of a crime and hence they are prohibited from using their own free will. Further, it is 5th amendment due to which Miranda is benefitted and supports with a right to get an attorney if an involuntary confession was discovered.
Analysis
The custody is of the accused who have committed some forms of crime and is been declared guilty or innocent. The custody of the accused happens when the crime has been committed and a warrant has been issued by...

SOLUTION.PDF

In Miranda v. Arizona, the United States Supreme Court held that the police must inform suspects, before interrogation, of certain constitutional rights. These rights have become popularly known as...

Answer To: In Miranda v. Arizona, the United States Supreme Court held that the police must inform suspects,...

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

Submit New Assignment