LP2 Video This assignment will assess the following competency 1. EVALUATE the Legal Environment of International Business. Directions: PARTICIPATE in a video presentation on the topic of global...

Asaahi metal case
Asaahi Metal Case
Case Summary
A person is injured
He claimed from Cheng Shin that supplied defective part
Cheng shin indemnified Asaahi company, a third party defendant
Local court and state supreme court offered decision in favor of plaintiff
But federal supreme court reversed the ruling
The case reveals information about the injury of a person due to fault of valve made by Asaahi company of Japan. Person claimed it from Cheng Shin but Cheng Shin indemnified asahhi company that is not local business in California. Local court and supreme court of state offered decision in favor of plaintiff but federal court has reversed the ruling in favor of defendant Asaahi company
2
Reasons
Federal court considers five points
Interests of plaintiff
Interests of state
Burden on defendant
Interests of states
Advancement of fundamental social policies
The reasons offered by federal supreme court includes five points. Interests of plaintiff is not found in this case, state interests is also missing, the burden on defendant Asaahi is found onerous. Interests of states is also not present in this case, the advancement of fundamental social policies are also missing.
3
Findings
Federal Supreme Court found
Due course is not followed
Burden on defendant was onerous
State of California does not have interests in case
State of California lacks interests because there is a third person interests involved of...