Please watch the short movie:
https://filmshortage.com/shorts/coward/(Links to an external site.)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vao7NCjEftY(Links to an external site.)
In a three paragraph essay, please answer the Central Historical Question:
Why was it necessary for the military in every country that took part in WWI to harshly punish (execute) deserters or those who refused to fight?
Why use friends and family members?
Task one: Please Carefully read the documents: Document A: Woodrow Wilson Speech #1 The people of the United States are drawn from many nations, and chiefly from the nations now at war. It is natural and inevitable that some will wish one nation, others another, to succeed in the momentous struggle. Such divisions among us would be fatal to our peace of mind and might seriously stand in the way of our duty as the one great nation at peace, the one nation ready to play a part of mediator and counselor of peace. The United States must be neutral in fact, as well as in name, during these days that are to try men's souls. We must be impartial in thought, as well as action. Source: President Woodrow Wilson, in a speech before Congress, August 19, 1914. Document B: Woodrow Wilson Speech #2 Property can be paid for; the lives of peaceful and innocent people cannot be. The present German submarine warfare against commerce is a warfare against mankind. The German policy has swept every restriction aside. Ships of every kind, whatever their flag, their character, their cargo, their destination, their errand, have been ruthlessly sent to the bottom of the ocean without warning. American ships have been sunk, American lives taken. I advise that the Congress declare the recent actions of the Imperial German Government to be, in fact, nothing less than war against the Government and people of the United States. Neutrality is no longer feasible or desirable where the peace of the world is involved. The world must be made safe for democracy. We have no selfish ends to serve. We desire no conquest, no dominion. We seek not material compensation for the sacrifices we shall freely make. We are but one of the champions of the rights of mankind. It is a fearful, but right thing to lead this great peaceful people to war. We shall fight for the things which we have always carried nearest our hearts – for democracy, for the right of [people] to have a voice in their own government, for the rights and liberties of small nations. Source: President Woodrow Wilson, in a speech before Congress, April 2, 1917. Document C: Textbook Excerpt on U.S. Entry into WWI In January 1917, Germany reversed its policy on submarine warfare. It announced that it would sink on sight all merchant vessels, armed or unarmed, sailing to Allied ports. While realizing that their policy might bring the Americans into war, the Germans believed they could defeat the Allies before the United States became heavily involved. An angry president Wilson broke off diplomatic relations with Germany. A few weeks later, a secret telegram- intercepted by the British government- set off a new wave of anti-German feeling. In late February the German foreign minister, Arthur Zimmerman, sent a telegram to Mexico with an offer to the Mexican government. Newspapers published the secret Zimmerman telegram on March 1, and the Americans reacted angrily to the German action. Source: The American Journey, New York: Glencoe/McGraw-Hill, 2003. Document D: Historian Howard Zinn (Excerpted from Original) Howard Zinn was a historian and activist who is best known today as the author of A People’s History of the United States, a book that tells American history from the perspective of people of color, women, and poor people. The book is very critical of the United States government. President Woodrow Wilson had promised that the United States would stay neutral in the war. . . . But in April of 1917, the Germans had announced they would have their submarines sink any ship bringing supplies to their enemies; and they had sunk a number of merchant vessels. Wilson now said he must stand by the right of Americans to travel on merchant ships in the war zone. . . . As Richard Hofstadter points out (The American Political Tradition): “This was rationalization of the flimsiest sort. . . . The British had also been intruding on the rights of American citizens on the high seas, but Wilson was not suggestingTask one: Please Carefully read the documents: Document A: Woodrow Wilson Speech #1 The people of the United States are drawn from many nations, and chiefly from the nations now at war. It is natural and inevitable that some will wish one nation, others another, to succeed in the momentous struggle. Such divisions among us would be fatal to our peace of mind and might seriously stand in the way of our duty as the one great nation at peace, the one nation ready to play a part of mediator and counselor of peace. The United States must be neutral in fact, as well as in name, during these days that are to try men's souls. We must be impartial in thought, as well as action. Source: President Woodrow Wilson, in a speech before Congress, August 19, 1914. Document B: Woodrow Wilson Speech #2 Property can be paid for; the lives of peaceful and innocent people cannot be. The present German submarine warfare against commerce is a warfare against mankind. The German policy has swept every restriction aside. Ships of every kind, whatever their flag, their character, their cargo, their destination, their errand, have been ruthlessly sent to the bottom of the ocean without warning. American ships have been sunk, American lives taken. I advise that the Congress declare the recent actions of the Imperial German Government to be, in fact, nothing less than war against the Government and people of the United States. Neutrality is no longer feasible or desirable where the peace of the world is involved. The world must be made safe for democracy. We have no selfish ends to serve. We desire no conquest, no dominion. We seek not material compensation for the sacrifices we shall freely make. We are but one of the champions of the rights of mankind. It is a fearful, but right thing to lead this great peaceful people to war. We shall fight for the things which we have always carried nearest our hearts – for democracy, for the right of [people] to have a voice in their own government, for the rights and liberties of small nations. Source: President Woodrow Wilson, in a speech before Congress, April 2, 1917. Document C: Textbook Excerpt on U.S. Entry into WWI In January 1917, Germany reversed its policy on submarine warfare. It announced that it would sink on sight all merchant vessels, armed or unarmed, sailing to Allied ports. While realizing that their policy might bring the Americans into war, the Germans believed they could defeat the Allies before the United States became heavily involved. An angry president Wilson broke off diplomatic relations with Germany. A few weeks later, a secret telegram- intercepted by the British government- set off a new wave of anti-German feeling. In late February the German foreign minister, Arthur Zimmerman, sent a telegram to Mexico with an offer to the Mexican government. Newspapers published the secret Zimmerman telegram on March 1, and the Americans reacted angrily to the German action. Source: The American Journey, New York: Glencoe/McGraw-Hill, 2003. Document D: Historian Howard Zinn (Excerpted from Original) Howard Zinn was a historian and activist who is best known today as the author of A People’s History of the United States, a book that tells American history from the perspective of people of color, women, and poor people. The book is very critical of the United States government. President Woodrow Wilson had promised that the United States would stay neutral in the war. . . . But in April of 1917, the Germans had announced they would have their submarines sink any ship bringing supplies to their enemies; and they had sunk a number of merchant vessels. Wilson now said he must stand by the right of Americans to travel on merchant ships in the war zone. . . . As Richard Hofstadter points out (The American Political Tradition): “This was rationalization of the flimsiest sort. . . . The British had also been intruding on the rights of American citizens on the high seas, but Wilson was not suggesting we go to war with them. . . . The United States claimed the Lusitania carried an innocent cargo, and therefore the torpedoing was a monstrous German atrocity. Actually, the Lusitania was heavily armed: it carried 1,248 cases of 3-inch shells, 4,927 boxes of cartridges (1,000 rounds in each box), and 2,000 more cases of small-arms ammunition. . . . The British and American governments lied about the cargo. . . . Prosperity depended much on foreign markets, it was believed by the leaders of the country. In 1897, private foreign investments of the United States amounted to $700 million dollars. By 1914, they were $3.5 billion. . . . With World War I, England became more and more a market for American goods and for loans at interest. J.P. Morgan and Company acted as agents for the Allies and when, in 1915, Wilson lifted the ban on private bank loans to the Allies, Morgan could now begin lending money in such great amounts as to both make great profit and tie American finance closely to the interest of a British victory in the war against Germany. Source: Howard Zinn, A People’s History of the United States, 1980. Task two: In a two paragraph minimum response please answer the Central Historical Question Why did the U.S. enter World War I? we go to war with them. . . . The United States claimed the Lusitania carried an innocent cargo, and therefore the torpedoing was a monstrous German atrocity. Actually, the Lusitania was heavily armed: it carried 1,248 cases of 3-inch shells, 4,927 boxes of cartridges (1,000 rounds in each box), and 2,000 more cases of small-arms ammunition. . . . The British and American governments lied about the cargo. . . . Prosperity depended much on foreign markets, it was believed by the leaders of the country. In 1897, private foreign investments of the United States amounted to $700 million dollars. By 1914, they were $3.5 billion. . . . With World War I, England became more and more a market for American goods and for loans at interest. J.P. Morgan and Company acted as agents for the Allies and when, in 1915, Wilson lifted the ban on private bank loans to the Allies, Morgan could now begin lending money