This is very critical assignment. It is the final research for this course and I need to get 130 out of 130. So please you need to focus and pay the right attention to the question and answer it as per rubric attached
Critical Thinking: Lean Operations (130 points) Evaluate the implications for operations management in organizations that operate internationally. For this assignment, you will select and assess the same type of product from two different firms, such as an SUV vehicle from Toyota, and BMW. (NOTE: You cannot use the automotive industry, so pick another industry that operates internationally) In a 6-page paper, defend the organizations’ production processes, customer interaction in those processes, if applicable, and the technologies used in production. Judge each organization’s commitment to quality and excellence, as well as the process used for measuring quality. Describe each of the selected organization’s inventory methodologies and model(s), and any areas for improvement. Describe each of the selected organization’s movements toward lean processes or Six Sigma, and how these impact the culture, efficiency, and success of each organization. Finally, compare and contrast each company’s production processes, customer interactions in those processes, and technologies used in production. Be sure to use at least two current, scholarly references beyond any required course readings. Current sources are those published within the most recent five-year period, and scholarly sources are those from peer-reviewed journals. Make certain for each listed reference that you have at least one supporting citation in the body of your content. Your reference page is always the last page of the submission where all individual references get listed. The Saudi Digital Library is a good resource to search for these references. Submit your presentation into the Assignment Dropbox. MGT530 Critical Thinking Writing Rubric - Module 14 Exceeds Expectation Meets Expectation Below Expectation Limited Evidence Content, Research, and Analysis 25-30 Points 19-24 Points 13-18 Points 7-12 Points Requirements Exceeds Expectation - Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment. Meets Expectation - Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment. Below Expectation - Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment. Limited Evidence - Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 29-35 Points 22-28 Points 15-21 Points 8-14 Points Content Exceeds Expectation - Demonstrates substantial and extensive knowledge of the materials, with no errors or major omissions. Meets Expectation - Demonstrates adequate knowledge of the materials; may include some minor errors or omissions. Below Expectation - Demonstrates fair knowledge of the materials and/or includes some major errors or omissions. Limited Evidence - Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials and/or includes many major errors or omissions. 37-45 Points 28-36 Points 19-27 Points 10-18 Points Analysis Exceeds Expectation - Provides strong thought, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications. Meets Expectation - Provides adequate thought, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications. Below Expectation - Provides poor thought, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications. Limited Evidence - Provides little or no thought, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications. 13-15 Points 10-12 Points 7-9 Points 4-6 Points Sources Exceeds Expectation - Sources go above and beyond required criteria, and are well chosen to provide effective substance and perspectives on the issue under examination. Meets Expectation - Sources meet required criteria and are adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination. Below Expectation - Sources meet required criteria, but are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination. Limited Evidence - Source selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient. MGT530 Critical Thinking Writing Rubric - Module 14 Mechanics and Writing 5 Points 4 Points 3 Points 1-2 Points Demonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style. Exceeds Expectation - Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; contains no errors in grammar, spelling, APA style, or APA citations and references. Meets Expectation - Project is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; may include a few minor errors in grammar, spelling, APA style, or APA citations and references. Below Expectation - Project is poorly organized and written, and may not follow proper format as outlined in the assignment. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development, and/or includes numerous or major errors in grammar, spelling, APA style, or APA citations and references. Limited Evidence - Project is not organized or well written, and is not in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar, spelling, APA style, and APA citations and references. Total points possible = 130 Critical Thinking14 SEU_MGT530_CTWritingRubric_Mod14