Being Professional.pdf 29/08/2020 Being Professional https://rmit.instructure.com/courses/62985/assignments/ XXXXXXXXXX/4 Being Professional Due Monday by 10am Points 25 Submitting an external tool...

1 answer below »
FIles


Being Professional.pdf 29/08/2020 Being Professional https://rmit.instructure.com/courses/62985/assignments/493700 1/4 Being Professional Due Monday by 10am Points 25 Submitting an external tool Available Aug 11 at 12am - Aug 31 at 10am 20 days COURSE NAME: Essentials of Health Care Practice COURSE CODE: PHAR1017 ASSIGNMENT TITLE: Assignment 1: Being Professional Weight: 25%  Due date:  Monday August 24 at 1000 Length: 1000 words + 200 word reflection  Feedback mode: Via Canvas  Feedback will be provided using Turnitin's Online marking tool and general comments.  Learning Objectives Assessed: 1. Describe principles of professionalism in health care practice 2. Communicate relevant information clearly and appropriately. Graduate Outcomes supported:  1. Work ready  2. Active and lifelong learners  Details:  You are required to prepare a 1000 + 200 word written assignment regarding professionalism and being a professional. You are required to use the template provided to structure your writing ___________________________________________ The Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA) is the organisation responsible for the implementation of the National Registration and Accreditation Scheme across Australia. AHPRA works with 15 National Health Practitioner Boards to implement the National Registration and Accreditation Scheme.  If there is concern or complaint about a registered health practitioner, National Boards may decide to refer a registered practitioner or student to a panel. Registered health practitioners may be referred to a performance and professional standards tribunal  for conduct and performance issues. 29/08/2020 Being Professional https://rmit.instructure.com/courses/62985/assignments/493700 2/4   You can also find detailed tribunal summaries at these links:  http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/tas/TASHPT/ (Links to an external site.) (http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/tas/TASHPT/) QTAC and VTAC case links.docx Using the links above, choose a case which you find interesting - it doesn't have to be a case related to your profession or your profession of interest.  Your assessment should address the following three points listsed below.  Use this  template for your assessment.  This is an extended "How To Template" that may help you organise your writing.  Summarise the case you have selected. (500 words) Analyse the case, using the language of the Profession definitions to explain why this situation occurred (500 words). In a personal reflection, explain how your review of the case will influence your professional and personal behaviour in the future. (200 words). There is no need to cite other works in this assignment. Please name your file Family name_initials_Assessment_1 prior to submission.   MARKING RUBRIC   Criteria Outstanding  Good Not Satisfactory Summary of case and reason for choosing case.   (9 marks) Summary is well structured, summarises the key points and is within word count (500 words).  (9 marks) Summary is appropriately structured, but does not cover all relevant points and/or does not meet the word count (over/under). (6 marks) Summary is not well structured, does not cover all relevant points and does not meet word count (over/under).  (3 mark)   Analysis of the Analysis is well Analysis is appropriately Analysis is not well 29/08/2020 Being Professional https://rmit.instructure.com/courses/62985/assignments/493700 3/4 This tool needs to be loaded in a new browser window case     (9 marks) structured, shows an excellent understanding of the concept of professionalism and is within the word count (500 words).     (9 marks) structured, shows a partial understanding of the concept of professionalism and/or does not meet the word count (over/under).    (6 marks)                                                                     structured, does not cover all relevant points and does not meet the word count (over/under) (3 marks) Reflection   (4 marks) Reflection is well written and meets the word count. Shows good insights into the issues raised by the case and makes links to personal growth. (4 marks) Reflections is satisfactorily written and meets word the count. Shows some insights of the issues raised by the case and makes some links to personal growth.     (3 marks) Reflection is not well written, and does not meet the word count. Does not show good insight into the issues raised by the case and makes few, if any links to personal growth. (1 mark) Quality of writing – includes spelling, grammar and punctuation. (3 marks) Excellent writing, with no more than five spelling, grammar or punctuation errors.   (3 marks)                                      Satisfactory writing, with no more than ten spelling, grammar or punctuation errors.  (2 marks)      Unsatisfactory writing, with more than ten spelling, grammar or punctuation errors. (1 mark)                                   Total        /25  Comments:   Load Being Professional in a new window 29/08/2020 Being Professional https://rmit.instructure.com/courses/62985/assignments/493700 4/4
Answered Same DayAug 29, 2021PHAR1017

Answer To: Being Professional.pdf 29/08/2020 Being Professional...

Popi answered on Aug 29 2021
154 Votes
Assignment 1: Being Professional
    1. URL of the case
http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/qld/QCAT/2017/431.html
    2. Summary of the case
In this particular case the applicant is L Mudge of the health Ombuds
man and the respondent is C Massy, instructed by hall Payne lawyers.
The health Ombudsman has referred to the Tribunal disciplinary proceedings on the 9th of August 2016 against the practitioner Mr. Barber. The allegations against the practitioner were arrows from different notifications to the health Ombudsman are being mentioned below.
A written self-notification made by Mr. Barber on 12th in January 2015 and another notification was on the behalf of Mr. Barber’s employer on the 5th of February 2015.
The allegations that are set out against Mr. barber are the trafficking of cannabis and the processing of cannabis. This misconduct violates national law. It has been reported that Mr. barber was engaged in the unprofessional conduct into the meaning of s5 of the health practitioner regulation law. He was failed to provide proper written notice to the Nursing Midwifery Board of Australia. According to the ss130 (1) and 133(3) (a) (i) of the national law Mr. barber was charged 12 months imprisonment and also changed by other punishable offenses. On the 13th of June 2014, he was sentenced for imprisonment for two years and four months but after that, he was released on parole. From the scenario, it can be noticed that Mr. barber was engaged in various unprofessional activities and use to provide false information about the renewal of registration of his application to the board. It has also been decided that the registration of Mr. barber will be suspended due to these criminal activities. The criminal offenses with that Mr. barber were charged are dangerous drug trafficking and possessing cannabis in multiple times. In the case of Mr. barber the violation of professional ethics, as well as unlawful conduct, can be observed. This is been considered as s sensitive issue. Mr. barber has been changed 12 months of imprisonment or more and convicted with various punishable offenses. He was needed to provide proper written notice to the board within 7 days about his charges. But it can be...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here