Fish and Asparagus Ltd. (“FASL”) is a federally incorporated business that operates a restaurant in each of Ottawa, Toronto, and Kitchener, Ontario. It also sells frozen dinners to grocery chains...

1 answer below »

Fish and Asparagus Ltd. (“FASL”) is a federally incorporated business that operates a restaurant in each of Ottawa, Toronto, and Kitchener, Ontario. It also sells frozen dinners to grocery chains across Canada. The frozen dinners are produced at its facility in Burlington Ontario.


The pandemic has been very difficult on the 3 restaurants in Ottawa, Toronto and Kitchener. But the frozen dinner business has picked up a lot during the pandemic.


It has been a tough year for the corporation on the whole. Aside from the pandemic, an employee who recently quit has stolen its secret recipe for its famous fish and asparagus meal and is refusing to return it unless he is paid $500,000. He says he will give it to a competitor unless he is paid.


Another frozen food manufacturer has started using a logo that looks very much like FASL’s except instead of a grey fish topped with asparagus, the competitor’s logo is a grey fish topped with green beans.


In addition, FASL’s CEO has just learned that a manager in its Toronto restaurant, Freddy Fowler, was asking job applicants about their religious beliefs during job interviews and refusing to hire some people based on those beliefs.


As if that were not enough, FASL had entered into an agreement of purchase and sale to sell a building it owned in Windsor Ontario, but the buyer refused to close the transaction. The buyer is very wealthy but simply decided not to close the real estate transaction. The sale price was $1.2 million, and FASL was counting on the sale proceeds to give it some cash flow and pay off its $800,000 mortgage on the property.


The restaurants have lost over $ 7 million since March 2020, but the frozen dinner line has generated a profit of $2.5 million. However, FASL owes $10 million to creditors and its only asset is the building in Windsor plus $200,000 in the bank. All its restaurants and its manufacturing facility are leased. The equipment in these restaurants in also leased from Super Duper Equipment Rentals. The production assembly equipment in Burlington is also leased from this company. FASL is up to date on all its lease payments, but cannot keep this up much longer since it only has $200,000 left.


The CEO and CFO think they can salvage the business if they close the restaurants, sell the Windsor building and focus on the frozen dinner business. The restaurants employ a total of 20 people. Management thinks 5 of those people have skills that could be transferred to the production plant in Burlington, but the rest will have to be let go. But they only have enough money to cover the negative cash flow for the next few months. There are 12 people employed in the Burlington production facility and the plan is to keep them working since the facility is profitable.


Question


PART A - IDENTIFICATION


First, identify all of the legal issues in this scenario. This can be done in bullet form. Correctly identifying all of the legal issues is worth 50% of the exam or 15% of your final grade. It should be about 1 page in length.


PART B- DISCUSSION


Next, discuss each legal issue in greater depth, and consider the possible implications for FASL as well as possible solutions. What legal tools are available to FASL to secure its objective of closing the restaurants and continuing to operate the frozen food business? This part is worth 50% od this examination, or 15% of your total grade.

Answered Same DayApr 26, 2021

Answer To: Fish and Asparagus Ltd. (“FASL”) is a federally incorporated business that operates a restaurant in...

Pallavi answered on Apr 27 2021
120 Votes
Part A- IDENTIFICATION
All the legal issues in this scenario have been listed below
· Theft of secret recipe by an employee of the company, and the criminal act on his part by threatening to disclose secret recipe to competitor of the company unless he receives $500000 from the com
pany.
· Use by a competitor firm of a logo that is almost identical to the FASL’s logo which it has registered for its frozen food business. This act is in violation of rights possessed by company as per the Canadian Trade mark law.
· Violation of Human Rights law by one of company’s manager in Toronto who asked about religious beliefs of candidates during the interviews. According to the Human Rights Legislation, no employer is allowed to discriminate in their hiring practices on the basis of those grounds which have specifically been prohibited, and religion is one of the prohibited grounds.
· Breach of contract by the buyer to purchase real estate property from the company without any valid grounds.
· Plans made by the company in relation to closing down its restaurant line of business as the same is not running in profits and company is thinking to lay off 15 of its workers who have been working for the restaurant business. The company would have to consider its obligations towards those employees according to the Employment law and Employment standards before laying them off.
Part B- DISCUSSION
Stealing of trade secret by employee and breach of fiduciary duty held towards employer
According to the facts of the case, one of the employees of the company who had recently left the company has stolen its secret recipe for its famous dishes and is denying to return it back unless the company paid $500000. He has threatened the company that if the said amount is not paid to him by the company, then he will share the secret recipe with the competitor of the company, which would obviously cause huge business loss to the company. As per the trade secret law which has been formed by the Supreme Court of Canada, a trade secret is a kind of Intellectual property right of the company who owns that secret formula as it consists of confidential information which is of proprietary nature. A trade secret includes product secret (chemical formula of a product), confidential business information, technological processes etc. which is used in the business and which gives the business owner an advantage over its competitors (PMC). In the given case, the secret that has been stolen is a secret recipe which clearly falls in the list of trade secrets as defined by the Canadian law. If an employee misuses the trade secret which is owed by their employer and was willfully shared with them only because it was necessary in the effective discharge of their duties related to their employer, then employer possesses the right to...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here