School of Nursing and Midwifery & La Trobe Rural Health School NSG2ANB: Written Task Marking Rubric Student Name: Criteria Excellent 80% - 100% A Very Good 70 % - 79% B Good 60 % -69% C Fair 50% - 59%...

file attached below


School of Nursing and Midwifery & La Trobe Rural Health School NSG2ANB: Written Task Marking Rubric Student Name: Criteria Excellent 80% - 100% A Very Good 70 % - 79% B Good 60 % -69% C Fair 50% - 59% D Poor 0 -49% N Clear identification and discussion of impact of hospitalisation to patient Identification Correct identification of one effect of hospitalisation on the patient Discussion A detailed and comprehensive explanation on how hospitalisation can impact the patient. (5 marks) Identification Correct identification of one effect of hospitalisation on the patient Discussion A reasonable and rational explanation on how hospitalisation can impact the patient. (4 marks) Identification Correct identification of one effect of hospitalisation on the patient Discussion A clear but superficial explanation on how hospitalisation can impact the patient. (3 marks) Identification Correct identification of one effect of hospitalisation on the patient Discussion A limited explanation on how hospitalisation can impact the patient. (2 marks) Identification Incorrect identification of one effect of hospitalisation on the patient Discussion A poor explanation on how hospitalisation can impact the patient. (1 mark) Explanation of impact and coping strategy/ies to enhance patients positive outcome Identification of coping strategy/ies and how it can support a more positive patient outcome that is evident and well discussed. (5 marks) Identification and discussion of coping strategy/ies and how it can support a more positive patient outcome is evident. (4 marks) Identification and discussion of coping strategy/ies and how it can support a more positive patient outcome is evident however requires clearer explanation (3 marks) Identification and discussion of a coping strategy/ies and how it can support a more positive patient outcome is present, however poorly expanded. (2 Marks) Lacks evidence of knowledge relevant to the topic. The question is not answered. (1 mark) Thoroughly supported by current academic resources Well justified and developed arguments with the support of current academic sources which have been thoroughly analysed, applied and discussed. (5 marks) Clear evidence of a wide range of current academic sources that are used well to support arguments. (4 marks) Evidence of application of readings appropriate to the assessment however minor gaps in the literature. (3 marks) Literature is used in an uncoordinated manner. Poor quality, or outdated literature used. There are significant gaps in the literature. (2 marks) Minimal to no evidence of appropriate and upto date literature used to support arguments. (1 mark) Total Mark Part A /15 Clear identification and discussion of impact of hospitalisation to patients’ family Identification Correct identification of one effect of hospitalisation on the patient’s family Discussion A detailed and comprehensive explanation on how hospitalisation can impact the patient’s family. (5 Marks) Identification Correct identification of one effect of hospitalisation on the patient’s family Discussion A reasonable and rational explanation on how hospitalisation can impact the patient’s family (4 Marks) Identification Correct identification of one effect of hospitalisation on the patient’s family Discussion A clear but superficial explanation on how hospitalisation can impact the patient’s family. (3 marks) Identification Correct identification of one effect of hospitalisation on the patient’s family Discussion A limited explanation on how hospitalisation can impact the patient’s family. (2 marks) Identification Incorrect identification of one effect of hospitalisation on the patient’s family Discussion A poor explanation on how hospitalisation can impact the patient’s family (1 mark) Explanation of impact and coping strategy/ies to enhance patients positive outcome Identification of coping strategy/ies to support a patient’s family experience that is evident and well discussed. (5 Marks) A reasonable and rational explanation of coping strategy/ies to support a familys’ experience is evident (4 Marks) Identification and discussion of coping strategy/ies to support a familys’ experience is evident but requires clearer explanation. (3 marks) Identification and discussion of coping strategy/ies to support a familys’ experience is evident but poorly expanded. (2 marks) Lacks evidence of knowledge relevant to the topic. The question is not answered (1 mark) Thoroughly supported by current academic resources Well justified and developed arguments with the support of current academic sources which have been thoroughly analysed, applied and discussed. (5 Marks) Evidence of a wide range of current academic sources that are used well to support arguments. (4 Marks) Clear evidence of application of readings appropriate to the assessment however minor gaps in the literature.