The review of evidence requires you to review the video of a cardiac arrest scenario from several years ago. (https://youtu.be/chMd3jjfrmo)The BLS video provided on this page only must be used.For all the discussion you need to link specifically to the ARC guidelines (do not use resuscitation guidelines from another country) and identify the research to provide evidence to support your comments. There are many journals with research into BLS and ALS so try and use these rather than a website (although the ARC website does provide reliable information as well. Examples of journals available via the library include: Resuscitation, Chest, Heart and Lung).
The guidelines for management of cardiac arrest have changed in the intervening period,
so you are required tocompare the performance to the current best practice evidence,
analyse the video for quality of performance and identify the areas of performance that are in keeping with the evidence as well as those that are different to the evidence.
You need to analyse the video and identify practices that are in line and not in line with theARC guidelines.
Where practice is not in line with the guideline you should identify what the participants should be doing differently.
You also need to consider best practice evidence for technical and non-technical skills e.g…(communication) in emergency situations and using that evidence,
·1500 word limit +/- 10% - anything over 1650 words will not be read or marked.
·2.5cm margins on all sides of page with double spaced in 12 point Times New Roman in WORD format. You are required to comply with set work limits, deviations beyond 10% either way maybe penalised (do not count the words in your cover page and reference list but do count the words used in in-text headings and citations).
·Submitting assignment in accordance withAPA 7threferencing style for both your in-text citations and reference list
- You must used a minimum of 10 peer-reviewed references plus the ARC guidelines. These references must be from the last 10 years with preference given to sources from the last 5 yearsand wherever possible refer to Australian resources, as this is where we are nursing.
·You must nominate which ARC guideline you are alluding to when critiquing performance and then support this discussion with detail from other research sources.
- The library is an extensive resource and it enables you to easily source recent evidence based information. Do not use evidence from DrGoogle, Wikipaedia, Mayo clinic, webMD - these sources are designed for health consumers not health providers,any such sources will not be deemed an appropriate reference.
Example ofquality of performance that are different to the evidence in the video
They haven’t check for hazard
Didn’t start CPR straight away
Haven’t check air way
And more…
Introduction
Dangers
Responsive
Send for help
Check Airway
Check breathing
Start CPR
"It was noted the depth of compression appeared inadequate on multiple occasions. According to ARC guideline 5 (2019) depth of compression of at least 5cm is necessary to generate a cardiac output. Several studies have identified the importance of compression depth during cardiac arrest (Frank, 2015; Smyth, 2015; Simmonds, 2017; Alfonso & Sidonas, 2018). Franks (2019) study of survival from cardiac arrest found a statistically significant relationship between return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and compression depth. Those patients who had compressions of 6 cm had a greater likelihood of ROSC compared to those with a compression depth less than 5cm (p=0.01). …………………………….”
(Example not to be used)
Attach defibrillator
Conclusion
Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here