The topic of assessment is "Ischemic Stroke and Psychosocial impact of ischemic stroke on caregiver, family after patient are home"It need include the role/input of the nurse/healthcare professional somewhere in your discussion.
NURS1001 1 | P a g e NURS7105 Critical Issue: Marking Criteria Criteria Fails to demonstrate most or all of the basic requirements of the assessment Demonstrates clear deficiencies in understanding and applying fundamental concepts; communicates information or ideas in ways that are frequently incomplete or confusing and give little attention to the conventions of the discipline Demonstrates superficial or partial or faulty understanding of the fundamental concepts of the field of study and limited ability to apply these concepts; presents undeveloped or inappropriate or unsupported arguments; communicates information or ideas with lack of clarity and inconsistent adherence to the conventions of the discipline Demonstrates adequate understanding and application of the fundamental concepts of the field of study; develops routine arguments or decisions and provides acceptable justification; communicates information and ideas adequately in terms of the conventions of the discipline Demonstrates substantial understanding of the fundamental concepts of the field of study and ability to apply these concepts in a variety of contexts; develops or adapts convincing arguments and provides coherent justification; communicates information and ideas clearly and fluently in terms of the conventions of the discipline Demonstrates substantial understanding of the fundamental concepts of the field of study with frequent evidence of originality in defining and analysing issues or problems and in creating solutions; uses a level, style and means of communication appropriate to the discipline Demonstrates substantial understanding of the fundamental concepts of the field of study with consistent evidence of substantial originality and insight in identifying, generating and communicating competing arguments, perspectives or problem solving approaches; critically evaluates problems, their solutions and implications Total Mark Grade equivalent: 0–29% 30-44% 45-49% 50-64% 65-74% 75-84% 85-100% Graduate Attributes A: IN-DEPTH KNOWLEDGE & SKILLS IN THE FIELD OF STUDY: A comprehensive u n d e r s t a n d i n g and in-depth knowledge in the field of study, including (where appropriate) and international perspective or appreciation of link between theory and practice. May also include evidence of appropriate ethical and social understanding, and an understanding of and Inadequate evidence of identification and discussion on the main elements of the topic and demonstration of understanding of the fundamental concepts, as well as incorporating either a professional, ethical, legal, social or cultural nursing perspective of the topic as appropriate. Minimal evidence of identification and discussion on the main elements of the topic and demonstration of understanding of the fundamental concepts, as well as incorporating either a professional, ethical, legal, social or cultural nursing perspective of the topic as appropriate. Beginning evidence of identification and discussion on the main elements of the topic and demonstration of understanding of the fundamental concepts, as well as incorporating either a professional, ethical, legal, social or cultural nursing perspective of the topic as appropriate. Adequate evidence of identification and discussion on the main elements of the topic and demonstration of understanding of the fundamental concepts, as well as iincorporating either a professional, ethical, legal, social or cultural nursing perspective of the topic as appropriate. Moderate evidence of identification and discussion on the main elements of the topic and demonstration of understanding of the fundamental concepts, as well as incorporating either a professional, ethical, legal, social or cultural nursing perspective of the topic as appropriate. Strong evidence of identification and discussion on the main elements of the topic and demonstration of understanding of the fundamental concepts, as well as incorporating either a professional, ethical, legal, social or cultural nursing perspective of the topic as appropriate. Comprehensive evidence of identification and discussion on the main elements of the critical issue and demonstration of understanding of the fundamental concepts, as well as incorporating either a professional, ethical, legal, social or cultural nursing perspective of the topic as appropriate. respect for the roles and expertise of associated disciplines 0-8 9-13 14-15 16-19 20-22 23-25 26-30 /30 B: EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION The ability to collect, analyse and organise information and ideas and to convey those ideas clearly and fluently, in written form. May include selecting and using the appropriate level, style and means of communication. Consistent spelling, punctuation and grammatical errors. Does not include introduction or conclusion. Inadequate evidence of planning, poor paragraphing, sentence construction and vocabulary. Consistent referencing errors. May not meet word limit. Numerous spelling, punctuation and grammatical errors. May not include introduction or conclusion. Minimal evidence of planning, basic paragraphing, sentence construction and vocabulary. Numerous referencing errors. May not meet word limit. Several spelling, punctuation and grammatical errors. May not include introduction or conclusion. Beginning evidence of planning, fair paragraphing, sentence construction and vocabulary. Several referencing errors. May not meet word limit. Some spelling, punctuation and grammatical errors. Includes introduction and conclusion. Adequate evidence of planning, sufficient paragraphing, sentence construction and vocabulary. Some referencing errors. May not meet word limit. Minimal spelling, punctuation or grammatical errors. Includes introduction with statement of aims and satisfactory conclusion. Moderate evidence of planning, satisfactory paragraphing, generally well-constructed sentences and good use of vocabulary. Minimal referencing errors. Meets word limit Minimal spelling or punctuation errors, good grammar. Includes introduction with statement of aims and good conclusion. Strong evidence of planning, good paragraphing, well- constructed sentences and very good use of vocabulary. Minor referencing errors. Meets word limit No spelling or punctuation errors, excellent grammar. Includes introduction with statement of aims and thoughtful conclusion. Comprehensive evidence of planning, excellent paragraphing, well- constructed sentences and expressive vocabulary. No referencing errors. APA 6th, including DOI or retrieved from in reference list. Meets word limit 0-5 6-8 9-10 11-13 14-15 16-17 18-20 /20 2 | P a g e C: LITERATURE AND RESOURCES The ability access and select appropriate resources to generate ideas, formulate and investigate problems independently and creatively. Majority of resources are not from peer- reviewed academic journals, appropriate texts, and/or appropriate professional websites (i.e.; the NMBA). Insufficient sources used. Many of the resources are not from peer- reviewed academic journals, appropriate texts, and/or appropriate professional websites (i.e.; the NMBA). Some resources are from peer-reviewed academic journals, appropriate texts, and/or appropriate professional websites (i.e.; the NMBA) some are within 5-7 years old with beginning discrimination of sources. Majority of resources are from peer-reviewed academic journals, appropriate texts, and/or appropriate professional websites (i.e.; the NMBA) majority are within 5-7 years old and are relevant with adequate discrimination of sources. All resources are from peer- reviewed academic journals, appropriate texts, and/or appropriate professional websites (i.e.; the NMBA) within 5-7 years old and are relevant with moderate discrimination of sources. All resources are from peer- reviewed academic journals, appropriate texts, and/or appropriate professional websites (i.e.; the NMBA) within 5-7 years old and are highly relevant with strong discrimination of sources. All resources are from peer- reviewed academic journals, appropriate texts, and/or appropriate professional websites (i.e.; the NMBA) within 5-7 years old and are highly relevant showing excellent discrimination of sources. 0-2.5 3-4 4.5-5 5.5-6.5 7-7.5 8-8.5 9-10 /10 D: CRITICAL JUDGMENT The ability to apply critical reasoning to issues through independent thought and informed judgement. The ability to process material and to critically analyse and integrate information from a wide range of sources. The ability to evaluate opinions and reflect critically in the justifications for decisions Inadequate evidence of the ability to critically evaluate information. Providing only basic discussion and listing of information without further explanation. Consistent instances of missing research to support statements. Minimal evidence of the ability to critically evaluate information. Providing only discussion instead of analysis and some listing of information without further explanation. Numerous instances of missing research to support statements. Beginning evidence of the ability to critically evaluate information. Providing mainly discussion instead of analysis and some listing of information without further explanation. Integrating research to support only some statements and ideas. Adequate evidence of the ability to critically evaluate information. At times providing discussion instead of analysis and listing of information without further explanation. Integrating research from a range of sources to support only some statements and ideas. Moderate evidence of the ability to critically evaluate information. Providing moderate arguments, different perspectives or problem solving approaches and/or solutions or implications of the topic. Integrating research from a range of sources to