Demonstrates knowledge of the Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia’s (NMBA) Code of conduct for nurses using the scenario provided.
|
You have accurately stated or described how Jamie’s actions have breached at least four (4) sections of the NMBA Code of conduct for nurses (2018).
You have included relevant and comprehensive explanations and examples in your discussion to address the Code of conduct.
Your response extends simple recall and attempts to interpret and analyse ideas to better answer the question.
(25.5 - 30 marks)
|
You have accurately stated or described how Jamie’s actions have breached at least three (3) sections of the NMBA Code of conduct for nurses (2018).
You have included specific examples in your discussion to address the Code of conduct.
Your response extends simple recall and attempts to interpret ideas to better answer the question.
(22.5 - 25.5 marks)
|
You have accurately stated or described how Jamie’s actions have breached at least two (2) sections of the NMBA Code of conduct for nurses (2018).
You have included specific examples to in your discussion to address the Code of conduct.
(19.5 - 22 marks)
|
You have accurately stated or described how Jamie’s actions have breached two (2) sections of the NMBA Code of conduct for nurses (2018).
You have included some broad examples in your discussion to address the Code of conduct.
(15 - 19 marks)
|
You have identified less than two sections of the NMBA Code of conduct for nurses (2018) breached by Jamie.
Very brief or no examples are provided when addressing the Code of conduct.
Information you have provided is inaccurate or not relevant to the task.
(0 - 14.5 marks)
|
/30 |
Demonstrates knowledge of the International Council of Nurses (ICN) Code of ethics for nurses (2012) using the scenario provided.
|
You have accurately stated or described how Jamie’s actions have breached at least
three (3) elements of the ICN Code of ethics for nurses (2012).
You have included relevant and comprehensive explanations and examples in your discussion to address the Code of
ethics.
Your response extends simple recall and attempts to interpret and analyse ideas to better answer the question.
(25.5 - 30 marks)
|
You have accurately stated or described how Jamie’s actions have breached at least three (3) elements of the ICN Code of ethics for nurses (2012).
You have included specific examples in your discussion to address the Code of ethics.
Your response extends simple recall and attempts to interpret ideas to better answer the question.
(22.5 - 25.5 marks)
|
You have accurately stated or described how Jamie’s actions have breached at least two (2) elements of the ICN Code of ethics for nurses (2012).
You have included specific examples in your discussion to address the Code of ethics.
(19.5 - 22 marks)
|
You have accurately stated or described how Jamie’s actions have breached two (2) elements of the ICN Code of ethics for nurses (2012).
You have included some broad examples in your discussion to address the Code of ethics.
(15 - 19 marks)
|
You have identified less than two (2) elements of the ICN Code of ethics for nurses (2012) breached by Jamie.
Very brief or no concepts or examples are provided when addressing the Code of ethics.
Information you have provided is inaccurate or not relevant to the task
(0 - 14.5 marks)
|
/30 |
Uses evidence to support and build knowledge in practice (Academic referencing).
|
In addition to the both the Codes, the assessment is also supported by at least eight (8) credible sources including peer reviewed journal articles, textbooks, and professional manuals and documents.
Chooses a variety of information sources highly relevant to the topic.
Referencing is comprehensive, demonstrates academic integrity, and conforms exactly to APA (7thed.) Style conventions.
(17 - 20 marks)
|
In addition to the both the Codes, the assessment is also supported by at least six (6) credible sources including peer reviewed journal articles, textbooks, and professional manuals and documents.
Chooses a variety of information sources relevant to the topic.
Referencing is comprehensive and conforms to the conventions of APA (7thed.) Style.
No more than two (2) minor errors or omissions in style and formatting choices which have no impact on the transparency and traceability of the source, or the demonstration of academic integrity.
(15 - 16.5 marks)
|
In addition to the both the Codes, the assessment is also supported by at least four (4) credible sources including peer reviewed journal articles, textbooks, and professional manuals and documents.
Chooses information sources relevant to the topic.
Referencing is comprehensive and mostly accurate according to the conventions of APA (7thed.) Style.
Up to four (4) minor errors or omissions in style and formatting choices have no impact on the transparency and traceability of the source, or the demonstration of academic integrity.
(13 - 14.5 marks)
|
In addition to the both the Codes, the assessment is also supported by at least two (2) credible sources including peer reviewed journal articles, textbooks, and professional manuals and documents.
Chooses information sources relevant to the topic.
Referencing is comprehensive and mostly accurate according to the conventions of APA (7thed.) Style.
More than 8 errors or omissions in style and formatting choices have no impact on the transparency and traceability of the source, or the demonstration of academic integrity.
(10 - 12.5 marks)
|
In addition to the both the Codes, the assessment is supported by less than two (2) credible sources, or sources that are not credible, or not relevant to the topic.
Referencing is inaccurate according to the conventions of APA (7th ed.) Style.
More than 8 errors and omissions in style and formatting throughout impact on the transparency and traceability of the source, and/or the demonstration of academic integrity.
(0 - 9.5 marks)
|
/20 |
Communicates Professionally (Academic writing and presentation)
|
Language features and structures are used to convey meaning effectively, clearly, unambiguously, concisely, and in a formal academic style, with few spelling, grammatical, or punctuation errors.
(17 - 20 marks)
|
Language features and structures are used to convey meaning effectively, clearly, unambiguously, and in a formal academic style, with occasional minor spelling, grammatical, or punctuation errors.
(15 - 16.5 marks)
|
The meaning is apparent to the reader, although text contains minor errors in spelling, grammar, word choice, and/or structure, and lacks clarity occasionally.
(13 - 14.5 marks)
|
The meaning is apparent to the reader with some effort, despite frequent and/or intrusive errors in spelling, grammar, word choice, and/or structure.
(10 - 12.5 marks)
|
Frequent, intrusive errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, word choice and/or structure prevent the meaning from being apparent to the reader.
(0 - 9.5 marks)
|
/20 |