concept map on cardiac chest pain ( acute coronary syndrome) power-point slide
the actual concept map and students need to present how each of the following clearly relates to the overall concept map:
Pathophysiology of the acute coronary syndrome (chest pain included)
Risk factors associated with acute coronary syndrome
Signs and symptoms of acute coronary syndrome
Diagnostic testing
Clinical management of the patient by the healthcare team in the hospital setting
Medication management
Complications
Please note:
Connecting arrows and linking words demonstrate the relationship between the pathophysiology and the signs and symptoms of the diagnosis (to demonstrate critical thinking and clinical reasoning).
Arrows MUST be used in conjunction with linking words/phrases
Connecting arrows and linking words demonstrate the rationale for the clinical
interventions identified by linking to the pathophysiology, signs and symptoms of the diagnosis (to demonstrate clinical reasoning and clinical judgement).
92438 Medical Surgical Nursing Assessment item 2: Concept map group presentation (30%) Due: Wednesday 9 September 2020 at 5pm Criteria 20% Pathophysiology and risk factors The concept map and presentation outline the pathophysiology of the disease process including risk factors. Marks 20 – 17 The pathophysiological processes of the disease are insightful, specific and clearly mapped and outlined in presentation. Insightful, specific and clear risk factors are presented. All clearly articulated with no more than a few grammatical or vocabulary errors that do not affect clarity. Marks 16 – 15 The pathophysiological processes of the disease are specific and clearly mapped and outlined in presentation. Specific and clear risk factors. There are no more than a few grammatical or vocabulary errors that do not affect clarity. Marks 14 - 13 The pathophysiological processes of the disease are clearly mapped and outlined in presentation. Clear risk factors. There may be some grammatical or vocabulary errors, however, they mostly do not affect clarity. Marks 12 – 10 The basic pathophysiological processes of the disease are mapped and outlined in presentation. Risk factors are mentioned, however, vague, inaccurate or non-specific. There are some grammatical or vocabulary errors that, at times, affect clarity. Marks 9 - 0 There is no/unclear mapping and/or outline of the pathophysiological processes of the disease and/or risk factors. There are some serious errors in grammar and vocabulary that affect clarity. 20% Signs and Symptoms The concept map and presentation outline the signs and symptoms associated with the disease process. Signs and symptoms are linked to the underlying pathophysiology and outlined in presentation Marks 20 – 17 Specific and clear identification of disease associated signs and symptoms that are specifically and clearly linked to the pathophysiological processes of the disease using arrows and linking words and outlined in presentation. All clearly articulated with no more than a few grammatical or vocabulary errors that do not affect clarity. Marks 16 – 15 Clear identification of disease associated signs and symptoms that are clearly linked to the pathophysiological processes of the disease using arrows and linking words and outlined in presentation. There are no more than a few grammatical or vocabulary errors that do not affect clarity. Marks 14 – 13 Identification of disease associated signs and symptoms that are linked to the pathophysiological processes of the disease using arrows and linking words and outlined in presentation. There may be some grammatical or vocabulary errors, however, they mostly do not affect clarity. Marks 12 – 10 Identification of some disease associated signs and symptoms. There is an attempt to link to the pathophysiological processes using arrows and linking words, and outlined in presentation, however, vague, inaccurate or non-specific. There are some grammatical or vocabulary errors that, at times, affect clarity. Marks 9 – 0 No / unclear identification of disease associated signs and symptoms. No / unclear link to the pathophysiological processes of the disease with no / unclear use of arrows and / or linking words and/or outline in presentation. There are some serious errors in grammar and vocabulary that affect clarity. 20% Diagnostic testing and long/short-term complications The concept map and presentation outline the diagnostic testing and short/long-term complications of the disease process Marks 20 – 17 Specific and clear identification of diagnostic tests and long/short-term complications in concept map and outlined in presentation. All clearly articulated with no more than a few grammatical or vocabulary errors that do not affect clarity. Marks 16 – 15 Clear identification of diagnostic tests and long/short-term complications in concept map and outlined in presentation. There are no more than a few grammatical or vocabulary errors that do not affect clarity. Marks 14 - 13 Identification of diagnostic tests and long/short-term complications in concept map and outlined in presentation. There may be some grammatical or vocabulary errors, however, they mostly do not affect clarity. Marks 12– 10 Identification of some diagnostic tests and long/short-term complications in concept map and outlined in presentation, however, vague, inaccurate or non-specific. There are some grammatical or vocabulary errors that, at times, affect clarity Marks 9 - 0 No / unclear identification of diagnostic tests and/or long/short-term complications in concept map and/or outlined in presentation. There are some serious errors in grammar and vocabulary that affect clarity. 30% Nursing actions and medications The concept map and presentation outline appropriate nursing actions and relevant medications. Nursing actions and medications are linked with the relevant pathophysiology AND signs and symptoms and outlined in presentation. Marks 30 -25 Specific, insightful and clear outline of the appropriate nursing actions and a specific and clear outline of relevant medications. Nursing actions are specifically and clearly linked to the pathophysiological processes of the disease and signs and symptoms using arrows and linking words and outlined in presentation. All clearly articulated with no more than a few grammatical or vocabulary errors that do not affect clarity. Marks 24-22 Specific and clear outline of the appropriate nursing actions and a specific and clear outline of relevant medications. Nursing actions are clearly linked to the pathophysiological processes of the disease and signs and symptoms using arrows and linking words and outlined in presentation. There are no more than a few grammatical or vocabulary errors that do not affect clarity. Marks 21-19 Clear outline of the appropriate nursing actions and a clear outline of relevant medications. Nursing actions are linked to the pathophysiological processes of the disease and signs and symptoms using arrows and linking words and outlined in presentation. There may be some grammatical or vocabulary errors, however, they mostly do not affect clarity. Marks 18-15 Brief outline of the appropriate nursing actions and a brief outline of relevant medications. There is an attempt to link nursing actions to the pathophysiological processes of the disease and signs and symptoms using arrows and linking words and outlined in presentation, however, vague, inaccurate or non-specific. There are some grammatical or vocabulary errors that, at times, affect clarity Marks 14-0 No / unclear outline of the appropriate nursing actions and/or no / unclear outline of relevant medications. No / unclear links made between nursing actions and the pathophysiological processes of the disease processes and signs and symptoms with no / unclear use of arrows and / or linking words and /or outlined in presentation. There are some serious errors in grammar and vocabulary that affect clarity. 10% Individual contribution to group work. Marks 10 – 8 Clear professional, collaborative and engaged level of contribution to the project tasks and high percentage of total contribution evident. Marks 7 – 6 Clear collaborative and engaged level of contribution to the project tasks and above average percentage of total contribution evident. Marks 5 – 4 Engaged level of contribution to the project tasks and average percentage of total contribution evident. Marks 3 – 2 Basic level of contribution to the project tasks and average percentage of total contribution evident. Marks 1 – 0 Limited level of contribution to the project tasks and minimal percentage of total contribution evident. Total /100