./
Visual Infographics present information, data, or knowledge intended to quickly and clearly communicate information to an audience. You are to research a chronic and/or complex health issue that interests you and develop an infographic, suitable for social media, that uses best available evidence to communicate information about health promotion or primary care and self-management for people and their families living with the chronic and/or complex health issue. You will be required to submit ONE PDF document via URKUND and Canvas containing: · Infographic suitable for social media as a PDF (1 page) · Summary of information (1000 words, +/- 10%) used to inform the details in your Infographic in relation to health promotion or primary care and self-management, including early detection and secondary management strategies. · Reference list containing high quality, peer reviewed, current (less than 10 years) literature and credible professional websites. Infographic: You first step is to research and collate information about a chronic and/or complex health issue that interests you. Ensure you are using up to date, reliable and relevant sources. From that information identify the key points you would like to make in the infographic. The next step is to create the Infographic using Canva (Links to an external site.). The free version is sufficient for this assessment. Once you have accessed the online program, search for Infographic. You can choose one of many templates available or create your own. Have fun and get creative. Review the relevant areas of the rubric to ensure you are meeting the assessment requirements. Sources of information do not need to be cited on the Infographic as you will be providing them in your Summary. Summary of Information: The Summary of information (1000 words, +/- 10%) includes intext citations and must demonstrate a fluent professional/academic writing style within the word count. The Summary of information provides the supporting evidence for details and expands on the brief information within your Infographic. The reference list is accurate using APA 7th Ed referencing system and contains high quality, peer reviewed, current (less than 10 years) literature. Use of credible professional websites is acceptable, but please ensure their quality, relevance, and currency of information. As with all academic assessments, students are required to comply with the University's policy and procedure for assessment items, inclusive of ensuring academic integrity of their work. All work must be the students own original work. Any suspicions of academic misconduct will be referred to the ADE as per university policy. The Assessment will be addressing learning outcomes: 1. Articulate health promotion or primary care in the context of chronic and complex care; 2. Identify key self-management principles and strategies 3. Demonstrate understanding of intensive (focused) care coordination for people with complex, unstable and comorbid conditions during hospitalisation, including early detection and secondary prevention strategies. Rubric Assessment 2: Visual Infographic & Written Summary Assessment 2: Visual Infographic & Written Summary Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeInfographic articulates health promotion or primary care for the chosen chronic and/or complex health issue 10 to >8.5 Pts HD Provides a sophisticated, thoroughly considered, and comprehensive synthesis of research data and other reliable evidence within the Infographic which articulates health promotion or primary care for the chosen chronic and/or complex health issue into a clearly coherent visual narrative 8.5 to >7.5 Pts D Provides a comprehensive synthesis of research data and other reliable evidence within the Infographic which articulates health promotion or primary care for the chosen chronic and/or complex health issue into a mostly coherent visual narrative 7.5 to >6.5 Pts CR Provides a reasonable synthesis of research data and other reliable evidence within the Infographic which articulates health promotion or primary care for the chosen chronic and/or complex health issue into a visual narrative that is overall clear 6.5 to >5.0 Pts P Provides an adequate synthesis of research data and other reliable evidence within the Infographic which articulates health promotion or primary care for the chosen chronic and/or complex health issue into a visual narrative that is mostly clear 5 to >0 Pts NX Provides an unsatisfactory response with minimal or no synthesis of research data and other reliable evidence within the Infographic which articulates health promotion or primary care for the chosen chronic and/or complex health issue into a visual narrative that lacks coherence 10 pts This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeIdentify key self-management principles and strategies, early detection and secondary prevention strategies for people and their families living with the chronic and/or complex health issue. 10 to >8.5 Pts HD Provides a sophisticated, thoroughly considered, and comprehensive response that clearly identifies and includes key self-management principles and strategies, early detection and secondary prevention strategies within the Infographic relating to the chosen health issue. 8.5 to >7.5 Pts D Provides a comprehensive response that identifies and includes key self-management principles and strategies, early detection and secondary prevention strategies within the Infographic relating to the chosen health issue. 7.5 to >6.5 Pts CR Provides a reasonable response that identifies and includes most of the key self-management principles and strategies, early detection and secondary prevention strategies within the Infographic relating to the chosen health issue. 6.5 to >5.0 Pts P Provides an adequate response that identifies and includes some of the key self-management principles and strategies, early detection and secondary prevention strategies within the Infographic relating to the chosen health issue. 5 to >0 Pts NX Provides an unsatisfactory response with minimal to no identification and inclusion of key self-management principles and strategies, early detection and secondary prevention strategies within the Infographic relating to the chosen health issue. 10 pts This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeThe flow of ideas is structured visually to ensure the Infographic is organised and logical for readability and engagement 5 to >4.2 Pts HD Exceptional flow of ideas which is well structured, organised, and logical. This enables clear readability due to the compelling layout. 4.2 to >4.0 Pts D Excellent flow of ideas which are organised and logical, enabling readability due to the organised layout. 4 to >3.2 Pts CR Good flow of ideas that are overall organised and logical, enabling readability through a reasonable layout which demonstrates some areas for improvement. 3.2 to >2.5 Pts P Reasonable flow of ideas which are somewhat organised. Consideration of the layout required further attention to readability. 2.5 to >0 Pts NX Poor flow of ideas which are not well organised or logical. Readability is compromised due to a confused and/or illogical layout. 5 pts This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeWritten summary of information goes beyond generalisations to indicate deeper knowledge of the topic area. 10 to >8.5 Pts HD Exceptional content that goes well beyond generalisations to indicate significant knowledge of the topic area. 8.5 to >7.5 Pts D Excellent content that goes beyond generalisations to indicate good knowledge of the topic area. 7.5 to >6.5 Pts CR Good content that overall goes beyond generalisations to indicate reasonable knowledge of the topic area. 6.5 to >5.0 Pts P Adequate content which includes several generalisations which indicate more basic knowledge of the topic area. 5 to >0 Pts NX Poor content defined by generalisations indicating limited knowledge of the topic area. 10 pts This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeScholarly approach to the written summary of information and reference list. Demonstrates attention to detail appropriate for academic writing, references, and in-text citations – consistent with APA 7th Style. 5 to >4.2 Pts HD Excellent scholarly approach to the presentation using appropriate methods and skills in line with APA 7th Ed style. Consistent and accurate use of grammar, syntax, punctuation, and spelling with no errors, demonstrating a fluent professional/ academic writing style within the word limit. In-text citations and references are accurate, with no errors or unsupported claims, using the APA 7th Ed referencing system. 4.2 to >4.0 Pts D A very good scholarly approach to the presentation using appropriate methods and skills in line with APA 7th Ed style with minimal errors or omissions. Grammar, syntax, punctuation, and spelling are consistent with minimal errors and minor revision required, demonstrating a professional/ academic writing style within the word limit. Minor errors in in-text citations and references with some unsupported claims, using the APA 7th Ed referencing system. 4 to >3.2 Pts CR A good scholarly approach to the presentation that mostly reflects the use of appropriate methods and skills in line with APA 7th Ed style with multiple errors or omissions. Multiple errors in grammar, syntax, punctuation, and spelling with limited editing and revision required. Adheres to the word limit. Multiple errors in APA 7th Ed in-text citation and referencing style and unsupported claims evident. 3.2 to >2.5 Pts P Adequate scholarly approach to the presentation that somewhat reflects the use of appropriate methods and skills in line with APA 7th Ed style, with significant errors or omissions. Significant errors in grammar, syntax, punctuation, and spelling with some editing and significant revision required. Meaning apparent, but language not always fluent. Below or above set word count limit. Significant errors in APA 7th Ed in-text citation and referencing style and unsupported claims. 2.5 to >0 Pts NX Unsatisfactory presentation with minimal to no scholarly approach that does not reflect the use of appropriate methods and skills in line with APA 7th Ed style, with significant errors or omissions. Minimal to no demonstration of consistent and accurate use of grammar, syntax, punctuation, that detracts significantly from the clarity of the writing so that ideas and understanding cannot be communicated clearly to the reader. Thorough editing and revision are required. Well below or above the word count limit. Incorrect application of APA 7th Ed referencing style resulting in inadequate acknowledgement of sources and risk of breaching academic integrity/plagiarism. 5 pts Total points: 40