Written Critique – of 1800 words...Review and critique of a case study that depicts the care provided to a patient and their family in a palliative setting. Critical analysis will be based upon a Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) to improve patient care..I have included an EXample how it needs to be.I have more information to upload..
Welcome to Assessment Task 2 your Final Task for NRSG374 Case Study Critique of care scenario…. Case Study of Tyler need to be read through-Complex. Clinical Practice guidelines to be followed… Care may or not provided for the patient. Look at literature-_ read disease progression, Pathophysiology… Example Neuropathy_ why it is happening. National Palliative Care Standards…Direct Care provision. Journal Article. Quality or NMBA Standards…Partnering with consumers. Talk and support in detail. Look at Clinical Practice guidelines. Care provision… What is recommended. Care gabs missed…Literature. Evidence based Literature..CRC I dentification – latest, Tyler Information….Thursday to MONday..Foucus in Issue ..National Pallative Care Standards 1-6 ..NMBA Standards 1-7… What we need to Know and What is Nice to know or see. Choose from… Care of Dying Patient ….. OR End of Life Appendix B – Assessment Task 2: Written Critique of care provided to a Palliative Care Patient Let's breakdown the requirements of task 2 NRSG374 Unit Outline Assessment Task 2 Details Students are to provide an 1800-word critique of the provided case study using only ONE CPG. · The CPG's to select from are: · Care of the Dying patient · End of Life Care To complete this task, you will need to discuss and critique relevant elements of the CPG and case study whilst upholding the National Palliative Care Standards at least one of: the below standards. • NSQHS • NMBA standards and/or Do we need to use all these standards to do well? · As the rubric states if you provide "Outstanding knowledge of themes and principles associated with palliative care" this will demonstrate an outstanding application of your knowledge to practice therefore using standards from more than one of the above and relating them together to uphold your critique of the patient care and support the clinical practice guideline selected will demonstrate excellent knowledge and understanding. Using one standard from one of the above will not provide strong application of knowledge. However, a comparison of multiple standards that as registered nurses we are required to uphold will absolutely demonstrate very strong knowledge and understanding, if you link them together well with evidence-based practice (EBP) Where do I find all these standards? You should be aware of all of the standards above as they have been discussed in many units throughout your degree, so now it is time to demonstrate your knowledge and bring them together. to assist you We have provided links below to each of the standards we would like you to utilise in your critique. NSQHS Eight National safety and Quality Health Service Standards to provide a nationally consistent level of care that can be expected by all consumers from all health organisations https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/standards/nsqhs-standards NMBA Seven Standards that all Registered nurses must uphold to ensure that they maintain their registration and provide person centred and evidence-based preventative, curative, supportive, formative and palliative elements to their practice https://www.nursingmidwiferyboard.gov.au/Codes-Guidelines-Statements/Professional-standards/registered-nurse-standards-for-practice.aspx National Palliative Care Standards Nine National palliative Care standards that you know well as they have formed the framework of NRSG374 and were fundamental for assessment task 1 https://palliativecare.org.au/standards How do I relate these standards to the case study? This is where your critical thinking and application of theory to practice is required, we cannot tell you how to do this, as a final year nursing unit it is essential that you are aware of how all of these standards, uphold and maintain, patient centred care, dignity, patient assessment and safety to name a few. Spend some time reviewing these and map out the ones that you believe are important for your critique. Purpose Students are required to demonstrate an understanding of how theory translates into practical nursing care and how evidence underpins best practice. Each student will review and critique the care given in the Case Study provided according to their choice of ONLY ONE of the provided Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG’s) best suited to the highlighted discussion. Where will I find the CPG's that you want me to use? You are provided with CPGs for this task, in this booklet. You need to choose one of these only to demonstrate the area of care that you are providing a critique of. You are not expected to look for other CPG's to support your work, however evidence based practice of peer reviewed journal publications are expected to further reinforce the critique. · Aetiology of Motor Neurone Disease · Consider the Patient Situation · Collect Cues and Information · Processing Information · Identifying problems/issues · Establishing Goals and Taking Action · Evaluating and Identifying new problems · Reflection · Clinical Practice Guidelines · References ASSIGNMENT 2 Written Critique – Review and critique of a case study that depicts the care provided to a patient and their family in a palliative setting. Critical analysis will be based upon a Clinical Practice Guideline(CPG) to improve patient care Due date: Tuesday 03 October 2021 at 9am Weighting: 50% Length and/or format: 1800 word +/- 10% Purpose: Each student will review and critique the care given in a Case Study to be provided. It is essential for students to demonstrate an understanding of how theory translates into practical nursing care. The critique will utilise contemporary evidence-based literature and standards to support the selection of ONLY ONE suitable Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) relating to the care needs of the patient and family presented. Learning outcomes assessed: LO1, LO5, LO7 Assessment criteria: The assessment will be marked using the criteria-based rubric. Please note that all materials need to be referenced according to ACU’s APA 7th referencing guidelines. WORD COUNT Writing requires skill and being able to write within a specified word limit is an essential component of professional and academic work. Reading and writing critically are fundamental skills which demonstrate an understanding and an ability to make judgements and solve problems, hence why only 10% of a word count should be direct quotes. That is, if the word count is 1500 words only 150 of those words should be direct quotes. Word counts provide students with an indication of the amount of detail and work required for each assessment item. What is included in a word count? Essentially, all text within an assessment item from the introduction through to the conclusion is counted in the word count. This includes all in-text citations, direct quotes and headings. The wordcount does not include the following: • Title page • Reference list • Appendices • Tables • Figures and legends REFERENCING This unit requires you to use the APA Standard 7 referencing system. See the ‘Academic referencing’ page of the Student Portal for more details. Recommended references Case study need to be cited when referring to it in the critique. ACU Case study reference to be used as well. Each time referring to a source it should be cited. The author should be read as ACU, and year is 2021, the title would be Assessment Two case Study Information. ACU documents as Reference. Intext citation for care of the dying patient CPG (ACU),2018). Intext citation for END of Life Care CPG (ACU,2021) Intext citation for Case study (ACU,2021) Reference List Case Study: Australian Catholic University. (2021).NRSG374 Assessment Task 2 Case Study. Https://leo.acu.edu.au/mod/book/view.php?id=3754387 Reference List CPG: ACU Clinical Practice Guidelines. (2018). Care of the Dying Patient. https://leo.acu.edu.au/pluginfile.php/4991074/mod_resource/content/1/Care%20of%20the%20Dying%20Patient%20CPG.pdf Paula J Appendix B – Criterion Referenced Rubric: Assessment Task 2 Written Critique RUBRIC Assessment Criteria Sequencing: Sentence and paragraph structure & intelligibility (15 marks) The content in the critique matches the outline presented in the introductory paragraph. Organised paragraphs with an excellent progression of ideas. The content flows from one paragraph to the next on all occasions. The critique ends with a concise, and rational conclusion Knowledge and understanding (35 marks) The critique provides a well-articulated understanding of how contemporary evidenced based theory translates into practical care. Excellent knowledge of National Palliative Care Standards aligned with at least one of NSQHSS and/or NMBA standards are demonstrated using a palliative approach within the critique. Critical thinking, reasoning, and evaluation of evidence (35 marks) A critical analysis and presentation of the case study with precise links between the details and care provided aligning with the principles of palliative care practice is formulated An applicable clinical practice guideline is selected supporting an excellent critique of the case study provided. Excellent identification of limitations, omissions and/or inaccuracies of care supported by contemporary credible literature and the selected Clinical Practice Guideline. Sources and Referencing (10 Marks) Credible and relevant references are used comprehensively. Accurate use of APA 7 referencing style in all instances. A range of in-text citations has been used comprehensively Mechanics (Grammar, Spelling and Punctuation) (5 Marks) There are no errors with grammar, spelling and punctuation, the meaning is easily discernible. The critique reads without interruption. . Assessment Two Case Study Information - Interactive Book ◄ Previous: Welcome to Assessment Task 2 your Final Task for NRSG374Next: Consider the Patient Situation ► Aetiology of Motor Neurone Disease Motor neuron disease (MND) is a progressive neurological disorder characterised by loss of motor neurons (Brown, Edwards, Buckley & Aitken, 2017). There are 4 main types of MND, depending of the level of motor neurone involvement and where symptoms begin. These include: · Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) · Progressive bulbar palsy (PBP) · Progressive muscular atrophy (PMA) · Primary lateral sclerosis (PLS) MND usually leads to death 20-48 months after symptoms begin, however 5%- 10% of patients may survive for more than 10 years (MND New Zealand, 2018). The onset of MND is usually between 40 and 70 years of age and is more common in men than women by a ratio of 2:1 (MND Australia, 2018). The prevalence is approximately 8.7 in 100 000 in Australia (MND Australia,